[#70977] [Ruby trunk - Feature #11473] Immutable String literal in Ruby 3 — arai@...
Issue #11473 has been updated by Shunichi Arai.
3 messages
2015/10/04
[#71062] [Ruby trunk - Bug #10892] Deadlock in autoload — eregontp@...
Issue #10892 has been updated by Benoit Daloze.
4 messages
2015/10/12
[#71090] Re: [Ruby trunk - Bug #10892] Deadlock in autoload
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2015/10/14
eregontp@gmail.com wrote:
[#71127] [Ruby trunk - Feature #11607] [PATCH] fiddle: release GVL for ffi_call — normalperson@...
Issue #11607 has been updated by Eric Wong.
3 messages
2015/10/20
[#71164] [Ruby trunk - Feature #11614] [Open] [RFC] use id_table for constant tables — normalperson@...
Issue #11614 has been reported by Eric Wong.
3 messages
2015/10/22
[#71211] [Ruby trunk - Feature #11607] [PATCH] fiddle: release GVL for ffi_call — naruse@...
Issue #11607 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.
6 messages
2015/10/27
[#71212] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #11607] [PATCH] fiddle: release GVL for ffi_call
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2015/10/27
Yes, user must check if the function is MT-safe. Probably fine
[#71246] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #11607] [PATCH] fiddle: release GVL for ffi_call
— Aaron Patterson <tenderlove@...>
2015/10/28
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 08:54:07AM +0000, Eric Wong wrote:
[#71254] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #11607] [PATCH] fiddle: release GVL for ffi_call
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2015/10/28
Aaron Patterson <tenderlove@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#71230] [Ruby trunk - Feature #11625] Unlock GVL for SHA1 calculations — tenderlove@...
Issue #11625 has been updated by Aaron Patterson.
5 messages
2015/10/27
[#71236] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #11625] Unlock GVL for SHA1 calculations
— Юрий Соколов <funny.falcon@...>
2015/10/28
What's about other hashsum algos? MD5, SHA2, etc
[#71242] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #11625] Unlock GVL for SHA1 calculations
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2015/10/28
Юрий Соколов <funny.falcon@gmail.com> wrote:
[#71239] [Ruby trunk - Bug #11384] multi-threaded autoload sometimes fails — shugo@...
Issue #11384 has been updated by Shugo Maeda.
4 messages
2015/10/28
[ruby-core:71116] [CommonRuby - Feature #11605] [Rejected] Ruby should raise on def(a='a', b) [optional param that can't be used]
From:
usa@...
Date:
2015-10-19 17:12:24 UTC
List:
ruby-core #71116
Issue #11605 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.
Status changed from Open to Rejected
Why did not you try actually?
~~~
irb(main):001:0> def a(opt='opt',required)
irb(main):002:1> p [opt, required]
irb(main):003:1> end
=> :a
irb(main):004:0> a('required')
["opt", "required"]
=> ["opt", "required"]
~~~
----------------------------------------
Feature #11605: Ruby should raise on def(a='a', b) [optional param that can't be used]
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/11605#change-54484
* Author: Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas
* Status: Rejected
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee: Yukihiro Matsumoto
----------------------------------------
Why doesn't Ruby complain when defining a method like this?
~~~
def a(opt='opt', required)
end
~~~
I believe it's impossible to call method 'a' passing only required, while sticking to the default value for 'opt', right? So, why should Ruby allow such definition?
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/