[#70977] [Ruby trunk - Feature #11473] Immutable String literal in Ruby 3 — arai@...
Issue #11473 has been updated by Shunichi Arai.
3 messages
2015/10/04
[#71062] [Ruby trunk - Bug #10892] Deadlock in autoload — eregontp@...
Issue #10892 has been updated by Benoit Daloze.
4 messages
2015/10/12
[#71090] Re: [Ruby trunk - Bug #10892] Deadlock in autoload
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2015/10/14
eregontp@gmail.com wrote:
[#71127] [Ruby trunk - Feature #11607] [PATCH] fiddle: release GVL for ffi_call — normalperson@...
Issue #11607 has been updated by Eric Wong.
3 messages
2015/10/20
[#71164] [Ruby trunk - Feature #11614] [Open] [RFC] use id_table for constant tables — normalperson@...
Issue #11614 has been reported by Eric Wong.
3 messages
2015/10/22
[#71211] [Ruby trunk - Feature #11607] [PATCH] fiddle: release GVL for ffi_call — naruse@...
Issue #11607 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.
6 messages
2015/10/27
[#71212] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #11607] [PATCH] fiddle: release GVL for ffi_call
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2015/10/27
Yes, user must check if the function is MT-safe. Probably fine
[#71246] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #11607] [PATCH] fiddle: release GVL for ffi_call
— Aaron Patterson <tenderlove@...>
2015/10/28
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 08:54:07AM +0000, Eric Wong wrote:
[#71254] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #11607] [PATCH] fiddle: release GVL for ffi_call
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2015/10/28
Aaron Patterson <tenderlove@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#71230] [Ruby trunk - Feature #11625] Unlock GVL for SHA1 calculations — tenderlove@...
Issue #11625 has been updated by Aaron Patterson.
5 messages
2015/10/27
[#71236] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #11625] Unlock GVL for SHA1 calculations
— Юрий Соколов <funny.falcon@...>
2015/10/28
What's about other hashsum algos? MD5, SHA2, etc
[#71242] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #11625] Unlock GVL for SHA1 calculations
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2015/10/28
Юрий Соколов <funny.falcon@gmail.com> wrote:
[#71239] [Ruby trunk - Bug #11384] multi-threaded autoload sometimes fails — shugo@...
Issue #11384 has been updated by Shugo Maeda.
4 messages
2015/10/28
[ruby-core:71012] [Ruby trunk - Feature #11537] Introduce "Safe navigation operator"
From:
matz@...
Date:
2015-10-07 14:30:23 UTC
List:
ruby-core #71012
Issue #11537 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto. I like the idea. My remaining concern is ".?" is too similar to "?." which is chosen by other languages. We cannot use "?." since it conflicts with a method call with a "*?" predicate method. Matz. ---------------------------------------- Feature #11537: Introduce "Safe navigation operator" https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/11537#change-54387 * Author: Hiroshi SHIBATA * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Assignee: Yukihiro Matsumoto ---------------------------------------- I sometimes write following code with rails application: ```ruby u = User.find(id) if u && u.profile && u.profile.thumbnails && u.profiles.thumbnails.large ... ``` or ```ruby # Use ActiveSupport if u.try!(:profile).try!(:thumbnails).try!(:large) ... ``` I hope to write shortly above code. Groovy has above operator named "Safe navigation operator" with "`?.`" syntax. Ruby can't use "`?.`" operator. Can we use "`.?`" syntax. like this: ```ruby u = User.find(id) u.?profile.?thumbnails.?large ``` Matz. How do you think about this? -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/