[#68137] improve semantics of manpages — "Anthony J. Bentley" <anthony@...>
Hi,
1 message
2015/02/17
[#68144] Re: Future of test suites for Ruby — Anthony Crumley <anthony.crumley@...>
FYI...
4 messages
2015/02/17
[#68343] [Ruby trunk - Bug #10916] [Open] What the Ruby? SegFault? — ruby@...
Issue #10916 has been reported by why do i need this acct just to create a bug report.
5 messages
2015/02/27
[#68373] Re: [Ruby trunk - Bug #10916] [Open] What the Ruby? SegFault?
— "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@...>
2015/03/02
> * Author: why do i need this acct just to create a bug report
[#68358] [Ruby trunk - Bug #10902] require("enumerator") scans LOAD_PATH 2x on every invocation — ruby@...1.net
Issue #10902 has been updated by Aman Gupta.
3 messages
2015/02/28
[ruby-core:68329] [Ruby trunk - Feature #10882] Provide Levenshtein distance implementation as part of stdlib
From:
shevegen@...
Date:
2015-02-26 15:56:29 UTC
List:
ruby-core #68329
Issue #10882 has been updated by Robert A. Heiler.
I would like to see this too - Levensthein distance is used a lot in Bioinformatics to calculate the edit distance between two sequences (in ruby, thus, two strings) - three operations are Edit, Replace, Delete (+1, -1, change information at that position).
I have no particular strong feeling about the name (e. g. distance) though perhaps it should be
require 'math/distance'
or something like that?
----------------------------------------
Feature #10882: Provide Levenshtein distance implementation as part of stdlib
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/10882#change-51680
* Author: Yuki Nishijima
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:
----------------------------------------
[Levenshtein distance algorithm](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levenshtein_distance) has been used by Rubygems, Bundler, did_you_mean and Rails and I think it's popular enough to provide it as part of Ruby's stdlib. It still seems a bit too high-level though, but definitely useful (e.g. [adding "did you mean?" to rake](https://github.com/ruby/rake/pull/29)).
API-wise, I would like to propose something like the following, but I'm totally open to hear the core team's opinions as I'm not sue if this is great.
```ruby
require 'distance'
Distance.levenshtein(str1, str2)
```
It would also be interesting to have `#distance` method on `String`:
```ruby
"word".distance("other")
```
which is implemented as:
```ruby
def distance(str, algorithm = :levenshtein)
# calculate the distance here.
end
```
so it can allow to change the algorythm when we add more (e.g. [Jaro窶展inkler distance](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jaro%E2%80%93Winkler_distance)).
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/