[#66678] [ruby-trunk - Feature #10481] Add "if" and "unless" clauses to rescue statements — alex@...
Issue #10481 has been updated by Alex Boyd.
3 messages
2014/12/04
[#66762] Re: [ruby-changes:36667] normal:r48748 (trunk): struct: avoid all O(n) behavior on access — Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
2014-12-10 0:44 GMT+09:00 normal <ko1@atdot.net>:
3 messages
2014/12/10
[#66851] [ruby-trunk - Feature #10585] struct: speedup struct.attr = v for first 10 attributes and struct[:attr] for big structs — funny.falcon@...
Issue #10585 has been updated by Yura Sokolov.
3 messages
2014/12/15
[#67126] Ruby 2.2.0 Released — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...>
We are pleased to announce the release of Ruby 2.2.0.
8 messages
2014/12/25
[#67128] Re: Ruby 2.2.0 Released
— Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>
2014/12/25
I can't install it in any of our Ubuntu servers using rbenv:
[#67129] Re: Ruby 2.2.0 Released
— SHIBATA Hiroshi <shibata.hiroshi@...>
2014/12/25
> I can't install it in any of our Ubuntu servers using rbenv:
[ruby-core:66877] [ruby-trunk - Bug #10450] multiple assignment in conditional
From:
recursive.madman@...
Date:
2014-12-16 17:01:16 UTC
List:
ruby-core #66877
Issue #10450 has been updated by Recursive Madman.
It is indeed weird, that this isn't allowed.
A few lines below where the parse error is thrown, there is
```
parser_warn(node->nd_value, "found = in conditional, should be ==");
```
for regular conditionals.
It seems weird to me, that one is a warning and the other is an error, when the parser has at that point already recognized the multiple assignment correctly.
The warning suggests that assignment in conditionals is discouraged. That doesn't explain though, why one is an error and the other is not.
----------------------------------------
Bug #10450: multiple assignment in conditional
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/10450#change-50430
* Author: bug hit
* Status: Rejected
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:
* Category:
* Target version:
* ruby -v: ruby 2.1.4p265 (2014-10-27 revision 48166) [x86_64-linux]
* Backport: 2.0.0: UNKNOWN, 2.1: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
multiple assignment is an expression whose value can be truthy (array) or falsy (nil, false), so why is there a restriction on its use in conditionals? A warning perhaps is justified, but a syntax error, why?
irb(main):001:0> if a, b = nil then 1 else 0 end
SyntaxError: (irb):1: syntax error, unexpected ',', expecting keyword_then or ';' or '\n'
if a, b = nil then 1 else 0 end
^
(irb):1: syntax error, unexpected keyword_then, expecting end-of-input
if a, b = nil then 1 else 0 end
^
from /home/alex/.rbenv/versions/2.1.4/bin/irb:11:in `<main>'
irb(main):002:0> if (a, b = nil) then 1 else 0 end
SyntaxError: (irb):2: multiple assignment in conditional
from /home/alex/.rbenv/versions/2.1.4/bin/irb:11:in `<main>'
irb(main):003:0> (a, b = nil) ? 1 : 0
SyntaxError: (irb):3: multiple assignment in conditional
from /home/alex/.rbenv/versions/2.1.4/bin/irb:11:in `<main>'
irb(main):004:0> (a, b = nil)
=> nil
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/