[#66678] [ruby-trunk - Feature #10481] Add "if" and "unless" clauses to rescue statements — alex@...
Issue #10481 has been updated by Alex Boyd.
3 messages
2014/12/04
[#66762] Re: [ruby-changes:36667] normal:r48748 (trunk): struct: avoid all O(n) behavior on access — Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
2014-12-10 0:44 GMT+09:00 normal <ko1@atdot.net>:
3 messages
2014/12/10
[#66851] [ruby-trunk - Feature #10585] struct: speedup struct.attr = v for first 10 attributes and struct[:attr] for big structs — funny.falcon@...
Issue #10585 has been updated by Yura Sokolov.
3 messages
2014/12/15
[#67126] Ruby 2.2.0 Released — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...>
We are pleased to announce the release of Ruby 2.2.0.
8 messages
2014/12/25
[#67128] Re: Ruby 2.2.0 Released
— Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>
2014/12/25
I can't install it in any of our Ubuntu servers using rbenv:
[#67129] Re: Ruby 2.2.0 Released
— SHIBATA Hiroshi <shibata.hiroshi@...>
2014/12/25
> I can't install it in any of our Ubuntu servers using rbenv:
[ruby-core:66617] [ruby-trunk - misc #10541] Remove shorthand string interpolation syntax
From:
plasticchicken@...
Date:
2014-12-01 14:03:21 UTC
List:
ruby-core #66617
Issue #10541 has been updated by Brian Hempel.
Recursive Madman wrote:
> Did you also check what character followed those interpolations? e.g. "#{@foo}bar" wouldn't be a candidate for the shorthand, so that shouldn't be counted.
Good catch: No, I did not. I'll try to get better numbers soonish.
----------------------------------------
misc #10541: Remove shorthand string interpolation syntax
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/10541#change-50234
* Author: Daniel Morrison
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee: Yukihiro Matsumoto
* Category: syntax
* Target version: current: 2.2.0
----------------------------------------
I would like to see the shorthand string interpolation syntax, "foo#@bar" deprecated and then removed in 3.0.
My reasons:
1. Most experienced Ruby developers I've talked to don't even know it exists.
2. It has been the cause of real problems. http://status.cloudamqp.com/incidents/vj62pnp62tj9
When a syntax is not widely known and has the potential for problems, I think it makes sense to deprecate and remove.
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/