[#47386] [Backport92 - Backport #6958][Open] buggy BigDecimal#integer? — "adrianomitre (Adriano Mitre)" <adriano.mitre@...>
7 messages
2012/09/01
[#47409] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6973][Open] Add an #integral? method to Numeric to test for whole-number values — "regularfry (Alex Young)" <alex@...>
12 messages
2012/09/03
[#47444] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6986][Open] Inconsistent result of BigDecimal#power — "phasis68 (Heesob Park)" <phasis@...>
7 messages
2012/09/06
[#47453] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6994][Open] yield plus splat unwraps too much — "headius (Charles Nutter)" <headius@...>
8 messages
2012/09/07
[#47460] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6997][Open] Improve documentation for OptionParser — "eike.rb (Eike Dierks)" <eike@...>
7 messages
2012/09/08
[#47465] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7003][Assigned] Please decide. MVM to be with 2.0? — "shyouhei (Shyouhei Urabe)" <shyouhei@...>
3 messages
2012/09/10
[#47523] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7022][Open] add event hook for garbage collection — "rogerdpack (Roger Pack)" <rogerpack2005@...>
7 messages
2012/09/14
[#47531] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7022] add event hook for garbage collection
— "rogerdpack (Roger Pack)" <rogerpack2005@...>
2012/09/14
[#47540] autoload & require — Xavier Noria <fxn@...>
Hi,
4 messages
2012/09/15
[#47562] feature request: thread pool class — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>
It has always seemed a bit odd to me that Ruby's sdlib doesn't have some kind of
4 messages
2012/09/17
[#47638] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7046][Open] ERB#run and ERB#result are not safe for concurrent use — "headius (Charles Nutter)" <headius@...>
11 messages
2012/09/21
[#47653] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7050][Open] encoding of String#unpack for 'H', 'h', 'B' and 'b' — "Eregon (Benoit Daloze)" <redmine@...>
6 messages
2012/09/22
[#47655] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7051][Open] Extend caller_locations API to include klass and bindings. Allow caller_locations as a method hanging off Thread. — "sam.saffron (Sam Saffron)" <sam.saffron@...>
13 messages
2012/09/23
[#47709] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7076][Open] TestUnicodeEscape#test_basic failure on Windows — "h.shirosaki (Hiroshi Shirosaki)" <h.shirosaki@...>
4 messages
2012/09/27
[#47719] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7082][Open] Process.kill 0 in windows can return spurious success — "rogerdpack (Roger Pack)" <rogerpack2005@...>
6 messages
2012/09/28
[#47730] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7085][Open] Subversion → GitHub gateway stops. — "shyouhei (Shyouhei Urabe)" <shyouhei@...>
27 messages
2012/09/29
[#47731] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7085] Subversion → GitHub gateway stops.
— "shyouhei (Shyouhei Urabe)" <shyouhei@...>
2012/09/29
[#47743] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #7085] Subversion → GitHub gateway stops.
— Evan Phoenix <evan@...>
2012/09/29
Hello shyouhei, =20
[#47746] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #7085] Subversion → GitHub gateway stops.
— Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>
2012/09/30
On 09/30/2012 02:33 AM, Evan Phoenix wrote:
[#48020] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7085] Subversion → GitHub gateway stops.
— "shyouhei (Shyouhei Urabe)" <shyouhei@...>
2012/10/16
[#48953] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7085] Subversion → GitHub gateway stops.
— "shyouhei (Shyouhei Urabe)" <shyouhei@...>
2012/11/05
[#49123] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #7085] Subversion → GitHub gateway stops.
— Evan Phoenix <evan@...>
2012/11/08
So sorry for the continual delay. I'm setting this up right now but it ap=
[#47735] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7087][Open] ::ConditionVariable#wait does not work with Monitor because Monitor#sleep does not exist — "rklemme (Robert Klemme)" <shortcutter@...>
10 messages
2012/09/29
[ruby-core:47642] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4085] Refinements and nested methods
From:
"ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...>
Date:
2012-09-22 00:05:08 UTC
List:
ruby-core #47642
Issue #4085 has been updated by ko1 (Koichi Sasada).
Assignee changed from ko1 (Koichi Sasada) to shugo (Shugo Maeda)
Any problem now?
----------------------------------------
Feature #4085: Refinements and nested methods
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/4085#change-29656
Author: shugo (Shugo Maeda)
Status: Assigned
Priority: Normal
Assignee: shugo (Shugo Maeda)
Category: core
Target version: 2.0.0
=begin
As I said at RubyConf 2010, I'd like to propose a new features called
"Refinements."
Refinements are similar to Classboxes. However, Refinements doesn't
support local rebinding as mentioned later. In this sense,
Refinements might be more similar to selector namespaces, but I'm not
sure because I have never seen any implementation of selector
namespaces.
In Refinements, a Ruby module is used as a namespace (or classbox) for
class extensions. Such class extensions are called refinements. For
example, the following module refines Fixnum.
module MathN
refine Fixnum do
def /(other) quo(other) end
end
end
Module#refine(klass) takes one argument, which is a class to be
extended. Module#refine also takes a block, where additional or
overriding methods of klass can be defined. In this example, MathN
refines Fixnum so that 1 / 2 returns a rational number (1/2) instead
of an integer 0.
This refinement can be enabled by the method using.
class Foo
using MathN
def foo
p 1 / 2
end
end
f = Foo.new
f.foo #=> (1/2)
p 1 / 2
In this example, the refinement in MathN is enabled in the definition
of Foo. The effective scope of the refinement is the innermost class,
module, or method where using is called; however the refinement is not
enabled before the call of using. If there is no such class, module,
or method, then the effective scope is the file where using is called.
Note that refinements are pseudo-lexically scoped. For example,
foo.baz prints not "FooExt#bar" but "Foo#bar" in the following code:
class Foo
def bar
puts "Foo#bar"
end
def baz
bar
end
end
module FooExt
refine Foo do
def bar
puts "FooExt#bar"
end
end
end
module Quux
using FooExt
foo = Foo.new
foo.bar # => FooExt#bar
foo.baz # => Foo#bar
end
Refinements are also enabled in reopened definitions of classes using
refinements and definitions of their subclasses, so they are
*pseudo*-lexically scoped.
class Foo
using MathN
end
class Foo
# MathN is enabled in a reopened definition.
p 1 / 2 #=> (1/2)
end
class Bar < Foo
# MathN is enabled in a subclass definition.
p 1 / 2 #=> (1/2)
end
If a module or class is using refinements, they are enabled in
module_eval, class_eval, and instance_eval if the receiver is the
class or module, or an instance of the class.
module A
using MathN
end
class B
using MathN
end
MathN.module_eval do
p 1 / 2 #=> (1/2)
end
A.module_eval do
p 1 / 2 #=> (1/2)
end
B.class_eval do
p 1 / 2 #=> (1/2)
end
B.new.instance_eval do
p 1 / 2 #=> (1/2)
end
Besides refinements, I'd like to propose new behavior of nested methods.
Currently, the scope of a nested method is not closed in the outer method.
def foo
def bar
puts "bar"
end
bar
end
foo #=> bar
bar #=> bar
In Ruby, there are no functions, but only methods. So there are no
right places where nested methods are defined. However, if
refinements are introduced, a refinement enabled only in the outer
method would be the right place. For example, the above code is
almost equivalent to the following code:
def foo
klass = self.class
m = Module.new {
refine klass do
def bar
puts "bar"
end
end
}
using m
bar
end
foo #=> bar
bar #=> NoMethodError
The attached patch is based on SVN trunk r29837.
=end
--
http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/