[#2139] Best way to install ri documentation — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
Folks:
On Monday, January 5, 2004, 2:29:57 AM, Dave wrote:
Hi,
Perhaps make it available for mirrors and save ruby-lang's bandwidth?
Hi,
So, I'm thinking about doing the following? Is this OK with everyone?
Hi,
On Tue, 6 Jan 2004 00:47:41 +0900
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004 23:30:52 +0900
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 12:01:38AM +0900, Dave Thomas wrote:
Hi, Dave,
Hi,
Hi, daz,
On Tuesday, 6 January 2004 at 15:02:50 +0900, NAKAMURA, Hiroshi wrote:
[#2163] Occasional --enable-pthread hangs... — Nathaniel Talbott <nathaniel@...>
First of all, thanks so much to all those that have helped with
On Jan 5, 2004, at 21:49, Nathaniel Talbott wrote:
[#2186] Absolute paths in shebang lines? — "J.Herre" <jlst@...>
What would the reaction be to reconsidering the following proposal?
[#2194] File.readable_world? and File.writable_world? — Ian Macdonald <ian@...>
Hello,
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 06:02:07PM +0900, Ian Macdonald wrote:
On Fri 09 Jan 2004 at 23:10:02 +0900, Eivind Eklund wrote:
Hi,
On Sun 11 Jan 2004 at 00:47:33 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
On Sun 11 Jan 2004 at 21:40:22 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
On Mon 12 Jan 2004 at 10:31:52 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
On Mon 12 Jan 2004 at 22:36:16 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
On Mon 12 Jan 2004 at 10:31:52 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
On Sun 11 Jan 2004 at 00:47:33 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#2211] xxx_init_copy — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
I notivce that there're a bunch of new xxx_init_copy methods: RDoc is
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
[#2216] ruby aborts in data-handling applications — xsdg <xsdg@...>
I reported a similar bug about 2 or 3 months ago. The problem seemed to go
Hi,
I've finally found a combination that will reliably segfault. Since my first post on this topic, I've switched the backend from BDB to GDBM.
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 11:32:59AM +0900, nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
[#2225] Fwd: [ruby-cvs] ruby: * file.c (test_wr, test_ww): New functions implementing new — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
On Mon 12 Jan 2004 at 23:38:29 +0900, Dave Thomas wrote:
[#2251] YAML_Unit_Tests failed — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...>
Hi,
[#2285] A suggestion for libraries such as base64.rb — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
Some of the older libraries simply insert stuff into the top-level
[#2305] Time#usec round trip problem — Minero Aoki <aamine@...>
Hi,
[#2306] YAML.dump("a".."z") — Minero Aoki <aamine@...>
Hi,
Re: Best way to install ri documentation -- please check this
On Jan 13, 2004, at 0:46, NAKAMURA, Hiroshi wrote: > 2. "./ruby rdoc" might require libruby.so, syck.so, etc. The trick > in rubytest.rb cannot do everything (such as digest/digest/md5). > I know current depending libs of rdoc does not require digest/md5, > but it could be someday I think. The surprising thing to me is that I thought YAML could fall back on using the Ruby-based code if the .so was not available. If that was the case, the RDoc would run with no special additional work. Is my understanding of YAML wrong? Cheers Dave