From: Dave Thomas <dave@...>
Date: 2004-02-03T12:49:15+09:00
Subject: Re: xxx_init_copy


On Feb 2, 2004, at 16:41, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

> Hi,
>
> In message "Re: xxx_init_copy"
>     on 04/02/02, Dave Thomas <dave@pragprog.com> writes:
>
> |Does that mean that there's no difference between dup and clone for
> |these classes?
>
> "clone" does
>
...

> "dup" does

...

Thanks, matz.

So I'm left wondering: nobu was talking about documenting dup and clone 
by documenting the corresponding init_copy method, but if dup and clone 
have different functionality, shouldn't they be documented separately?


Cheers

Dave