[ruby-core:113202] [Ruby master Feature#19573] Add Class#singleton_inherited
From:
"Eregon (Benoit Daloze) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>
Date:
2023-04-12 21:15:04 UTC
List:
ruby-core #113202
Issue #19573 has been updated by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).
Related: https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19538?next_issue_id=19537&prev_issue_id=19541#note-7
----------------------------------------
Feature #19573: Add Class#singleton_inherited
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19573#change-102745
* Author: jeremyevans0 (Jeremy Evans)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
----------------------------------------
This would be similar to `Class#inherited`, but would be called with singleton classes of instances instead of subclasses. This could be used to warn or raise on singleton class creation, or modify the instance to change behavior, such as allow optimizations when a singleton class does not exist, but allow fallbacks if it does exist.
```ruby
c = Class.new do
def self.inherited(subclass)
p :inherited
end
def self.singleton_inherited(singleton_class)
# could use singleton_class.attached_object for modifying related object
p :singleton_inherited
end
end
Class.new(c)
# prints :inherited
c.new.singleton_class
# prints :singleton_inherited
```
This could potentially be an instance method (e.g. `Kernel#singleton_class_created` or `BasicObject#singleton_class_created`) instead of a class method. However, that would not grant any additional flexibility, since per-object behavior first requires creation of a singleton class.
If this is accepted, should the method be called for singleton classes created by `Kernel#clone` if the receiver has a singleton class? I think it should, as `Class#inherited` is called for `Class#clone`.
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
______________________________________________
ruby-core mailing list -- ruby-core@ml.ruby-lang.org
To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-core-leave@ml.ruby-lang.org
ruby-core info -- https://ml.ruby-lang.org/mailman3/postorius/lists/ruby-core.ml.ruby-lang.org/