[#113107] [Ruby master Bug#19576] Backport request: Gemfile.lock resolving is broken with bundler shipped with Ruby 3.1.4 — "jprokop (Jarek Prokop) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #19576 has been reported by jprokop (Jarek Prokop).

8 messages 2023/04/04

[#113112] [Ruby master Bug#19578] abort() shows stack trace when run within rescue clause — "Dan0042 (Daniel DeLorme) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #19578 has been reported by Dan0042 (Daniel DeLorme).

8 messages 2023/04/04

[#113180] [Ruby master Feature#19588] Allow Comparable#clamp(min, max) to accept nil as a specification — "kyanagi (Kouhei Yanagita) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #19588 has been reported by kyanagi (Kouhei Yanagita).

7 messages 2023/04/11

[#113209] [Ruby master Bug#19596] Decreased performance after upgrading from ruby 2.7.2 to ruby 3.2.2 — silva96 via ruby-core <ruby-core@...>

Issue #19596 has been reported by silva96 (Benjam=EDn Silva).

7 messages 2023/04/13

[#113238] [Ruby master Misc#19599] DevMeeting-2023-05-10 — "mame (Yusuke Endoh) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #19599 has been reported by mame (Yusuke Endoh).

14 messages 2023/04/14

[#113285] [Ruby master Bug#19607] Introduce `Hash#symbolize_keys`. — "ioquatix (Samuel Williams) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #19607 has been reported by ioquatix (Samuel Williams).

8 messages 2023/04/18

[#113303] [Ruby master Feature#19610] GC.delay_promotion — "peterzhu2118 (Peter Zhu) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #19610 has been reported by peterzhu2118 (Peter Zhu).

9 messages 2023/04/20

[#113313] [Ruby master Bug#19613] Add version information to all function documentation — "fulldecent (William Entriken) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #19613 has been reported by fulldecent (William Entriken).

7 messages 2023/04/23

[#113342] [Ruby master Feature#19617] Add Method#binding and UnboundMethod#binding, similar to Proc#binding — "nevans (Nicholas Evans) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #19617 has been reported by nevans (Nicholas Evans).

9 messages 2023/04/25

[#113381] [Ruby master Bug#19624] Backticks - IO object leakage — pineman via ruby-core <ruby-core@...>

Issue #19624 has been reported by pineman (Jo=E3o Pinheiro).

10 messages 2023/04/30

[ruby-core:113090] [Ruby master Feature#19571] Add REMEMBERED_WB_UNPROTECTED_OBJECTS_LIMIT_RATIO to the GC

From: "ko1 (Koichi Sasada) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>
Date: 2023-04-03 18:36:12 UTC
List: ruby-core #113090
Issue #19571 has been updated by ko1 (Koichi Sasada).


Could you make clear the following?

* Please describe how the new parameter is used and how the current implementation calculate without new parameter.
  * my understanding is this parameter is used for the major GC condition.
* This new parameter can reduce major GC count (and this is why the figures show the results)
  * Can we compare the major GC counts, uncollectible objects count and memory footprint?
* Could you try with other parameters, from 0.10 to 0.50 for example?

Maybe this proposal is based on the assumption that "we can't collect uncollectible objects in many cases so the collection rate (== major GC counts) should be reduced".
I agree this assumption in general. Can we make some kind of evidence?

Trivial comment:
This parameter is ratio for the "old objects" so I'm not sure it makes sense.


----------------------------------------
Feature #19571: Add REMEMBERED_WB_UNPROTECTED_OBJECTS_LIMIT_RATIO to the GC
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19571#change-102623

* Author: peterzhu2118 (Peter Zhu)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
----------------------------------------
GitHub PR: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/7577

The proposed PR adds the environment variable `RUBY_GC_HEAP_REMEMBERED_WB_UNPROTECTED_OBJECTS_LIMIT_RATIO` which is used to calculate the `remembered_wb_unprotected_objects_limit` using a ratio of `old_objects`. This should improve performance by reducing major GC because, in a major GC, we mark all of the old objects, so we should have more uncollectible WB unprotected objects before starting a major GC. The default has been set to 0.01 (1% of old objects).

On one of [Shopify's highest traffic Ruby apps, Storefront Renderer](https://shopify.engineering/how-shopify-reduced-storefront-response-times-rewrite), we saw significant improvements after deploying this patch in production. In the graphs below, we have the `tuned` group which uses `RUBY_GC_HEAP_REMEMBERED_WB_UNPROTECTED_OBJECTS_LIMIT_RATIO=0.01` (the default value), and an `untuned` group, which turns this feature off with `RUBY_GC_HEAP_REMEMBERED_WB_UNPROTECTED_OBJECTS_LIMIT_RATIO=0`. We see that the tuned group spends significantly less time in GC, on average 0.67x of the time compared to the untuned group and 0.49x for p99. We see this improvement in GC time translate to improvements in response times. The average response time is now 0.96x of the time compared to the untuned group and 0.86x for p99.

![](Screenshot%202023-04-03%20at%2011.39.06%20AM.png)


---Files--------------------------------
Screenshot 2023-04-03 at 11.39.06 AM.png (554 KB)


-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
 ______________________________________________
 ruby-core mailing list -- ruby-core@ml.ruby-lang.org
 To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-core-leave@ml.ruby-lang.org
 ruby-core info -- https://ml.ruby-lang.org/mailman3/postorius/lists/ruby-core.ml.ruby-lang.org/

In This Thread