ruby-talk

Mailing Lists

ruby-list (For Ruby users, JA) ruby-dev (For Ruby developers, JA) ruby-core (For Ruby developers, EN) ruby-talk (For Ruby users, EN)

[#264] Ruby 1.3.2-990402 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

Ruby 1.3.2-990402 is out, check out:

1 message 1999/04/02

[#266] Ruby 1.3.2-990405 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

Ruby 1.3.2-990405 is out, check out:

1 message 1999/04/05

[#267] Ruby 1.3.2-990408 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

Ruby 1.3.2-990408 is out, check out:

1 message 1999/04/08

[#268] win32 request — "bryce" <thecrow@...>

Matz, would it be possible for you to not only have the

2 messages 1999/04/11

[#269] Re: win32 request — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/04/12

Hi,

[#270] a bit off topic — "bryce" <thecrow@...>

I was wondering why Ruby doesn't have a newsgroup?

2 messages 1999/04/12

[#271] Re: a bit off topic — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/04/13

Hi.

[#272] ruby 1.2.5 is released — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)

Hi.

1 message 1999/04/13

[#273] Ruby 1.3.2-990413 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

Ruby 1.3.2-990413 is out, check out:

1 message 1999/04/13

[#274] IPv6-ready ruby — Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino <itojun@...>

We KAME team (www.kame.net) are working on IPv6-ready ruby.

7 messages 1999/04/13

[#275] Re: IPv6-ready ruby — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/04/14

In message "[ruby-talk:00274] IPv6-ready ruby"

[#276] Re: IPv6-ready ruby — Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino <itojun@...> 1999/04/14

[#277] Re: IPv6-ready ruby — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/04/14

In message "[ruby-talk:00276] Re: IPv6-ready ruby"

[#278] Re: IPv6-ready ruby — Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino <itojun@...> 1999/04/14

>> Snapshot dated 19990413 may not work on IPv4-only environment.

[#279] Re: IPv6-ready ruby — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/04/14

In message "[ruby-talk:00278] Re: IPv6-ready ruby"

[#280] Re: IPv6-ready ruby — Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino <itojun@...> 1999/04/14

[#281] 'case' question — "bryce" <thecrow@...>

The following code works fine:

2 messages 1999/04/14

[#282] Re: 'case' question — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/04/15

Hi.

[#283] Object delete itself? — "bryce" <thecrow@...>

Can an object delete itself?

2 messages 1999/04/17

[#284] Re: Object delete itself? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/04/17

[#285] Ruby/Win32 question — "bryce" <thecrow@...>

I have a window class instance.

4 messages 1999/04/22

[#286] Re: Ruby/Win32 question — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/04/23

Hi.

[#289] Re: Ruby/Win32 question — "Bryce Dooley" <thecrow@...> 1999/04/26

> |

[#290] Re: Ruby/Win32 question — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/04/27

Hi.

[#287] Extensions to Ruby — Michael Neumann <neumann@...>

2 messages 1999/04/25

[#288] Re: Extensions to Ruby — "Bryce Dooley" <thecrow@...> 1999/04/25

> How can I write extensions to ruby?

[#291] AW: Re: Extensions to Ruby — Michael Neumann <neumann@...>

> Michael,

4 messages 1999/04/27

[#294] Re: AW: Re: Extensions to Ruby — KIMURA Koichi <kimura@...> 1999/04/28

[#292] Re: AW: Re: Extensions to Ruby — "Bryce Dooley" <thecrow@...> 1999/04/27

> But there's still one problem: I use VC++ and want to create a DLL.

[#293] Re: AW: Re: Extensions to Ruby — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/04/28

Hi.

[#295] AW: Re: AW: Re: Extensions to Ruby — Michael Neumann <neumann@...>

> Let me know how this goes for you.

2 messages 1999/04/28

[#296] Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: Extensions to Ruby — "Bryce Dooley" <thecrow@...> 1999/04/28

> Am I right that you are the one who writes a GUI for Windows?

[#297] Ruby 1.3.3-990430 — matz <matz@...>

Ruby 1.3.3-990430 is out, check out:

1 message 1999/04/30

[#298] AW: Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: Extensions to Ruby — Michael Neumann <neumann@...>

> Of course, anyone who wants to contribute to the project is very

2 messages 1999/04/30

[#299] Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: Extensions to Ruby — "Bryce Dooley" <thecrow@...> 1999/05/07

I apologize for the delay in my reply.

[ruby-talk:00286] Re: Ruby/Win32 question

From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)

Date: 1999-04-23 01:38:52 UTC

List: ruby-talk #286

Hi.

In message "[ruby-talk:00285] Ruby/Win32 question"
    on 99/04/22, "bryce" <thecrow@cyberdude.com> writes:
|
|I want the object to be destroyed regardless of how many
|references there are to it when the WM_DESTROY message
|is received by object 'x' (which is the window).

Hmm, for example, IO objects are NOT destroyed on close(), even though
any operation on them are useless.  They raise exceptions for
operations after closing.  I think it's enough for treating
WM_DESTROYed Window objects as well.

                                        matz.

Thread

In This Thread