From: zverok.offline@... Date: 2018-11-15T10:09:09+00:00 Subject: [ruby-core:89808] [CommonRuby Feature#13581] Syntax sugar for method reference Issue #13581 has been updated by zverok (Victor Shepelev). > Just an opinion It is funny how when you show some imaginary code, quick-written just to illustrate the point of a language feature, people tend to discuss this code's design approaches instead. Yes, obviously, in the situation like "several consecutive, algorithmically complex methods working on the same collection" it is _typically_ wise to just wrap collection items. But that has _absolutely_ nothing to do with the point of my example. ---------------------------------------- Feature #13581: Syntax sugar for method reference https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/13581#change-74870 * Author: americodls (Americo Duarte) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Assignee: * Target version: ---------------------------------------- Some another programming languages (even Java, in version 8) has a cool way to refer a method as a reference. I wrote some examples here: https://gist.github.com/americodls/20981b2864d166eee8d231904303f24b I miss this thing in ruby. I would thinking if is possible some like this: ~~~ roots = [1, 4, 9].map &Math.method(:sqrt) ~~~ Could be like this: ~~~ roots = [1, 4, 9].map Math->method ~~~ What do you guys thinking about it? -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ Unsubscribe: