[#86520] [Ruby trunk Bug#14681] `syswrite': stream closed in another thread (IOError) — samuel@...
Issue #14681 has been reported by ioquatix (Samuel Williams).
3 messages
2018/04/12
[#86755] [Ruby trunk Feature#14723] [WIP] sleepy GC — normalperson@...
Issue #14723 has been reported by normalperson (Eric Wong).
6 messages
2018/04/29
[ruby-core:86693] [Ruby trunk Feature#14701] If the object is not frozen, I want to be able to redefine the compound assignment operator.
From:
sonots@...
Date:
2018-04-26 07:22:00 UTC
List:
ruby-core #86693
Issue #14701 has been updated by sonots (Naotoshi Seo).
As first thing to say, we do not expect changing behavior of `+=` for ruby built-in types such as string or array.
We want to have an extension point to redefine `+=` for our library such as NArray.
How it should behave is the design choice and responsibility of such libraries.
> Most Rubyists know and expect that Array#+ is non-destructive, so I think that it is unacceptable to allow this.
I mean that It is even possible to redefine `+` operator to be destructive. It is design choice and responsibility of libraries.
> Do you mean introducing another set of destructive operators, like a +! 1 instead of a += 1? It is not very cool, but it seems more reasonable to me.
Yes, as a compromise. I still prefer `+=`, though.
> IMO, the fundamental flaw is to split + and +=.
IMO, it is design responsibility of libraries. But, I understand what you says partially. I will think of this.
----------------------------------------
Feature #14701: If the object is not frozen, I want to be able to redefine the compound assignment operator.
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/14701#change-71652
* Author: naitoh (Jun NAITOH)
* Status: Rejected
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:
* Target version:
----------------------------------------
If the object is not frozen, I want to be able to redefine the compound assignment operator (e.g. +=, -=, *=, /=, ..etc ).
https://docs.ruby-lang.org/ja/latest/doc/spec=2foperator.html
* Redefinable operator (method)
~~~
| ^ & <=> == === =~ > >= < <= << >>
+ - * / % ** ~ +@ -@ [] []= ` ! != !~
~~~
* use case
~~~
> require 'numo/narray'
> a = Numo::Int32[5, 6]
=> Numo::Int32#shape=[2]
[5, 6]
> a.object_id
=> 70326927544920
> a += 1
=> Numo::Int32#shape=[2]
[6, 7]
> a.object_id
=> 70326927530540
> a.inplace + 1
=> Numo::Int32(view)#shape=[2]
[7, 8]
> a.object_id
=> 70326927530540
~~~
With Numo::NArray, using "inplace" instead of "+=" will update the same object so it will be faster.
I want to write "a += 1" instead of "a.inplace + 1".
However, Ruby can not redefine "+=".
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>