From: matz@... Date: 2016-08-09T05:55:13+00:00 Subject: [ruby-core:76773] [Ruby trunk Feature#10594] Comparable#clamp Issue #10594 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto. I accept the idea of `#clamp` as `Comparable#clamp(min, max)`. It would not accept ranges (for now). Matz. ---------------------------------------- Feature #10594: Comparable#clamp https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/10594#change-59996 * Author: Chris Johnson * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Assignee: ---------------------------------------- This is basically a re-opening of the feature request of issue#4573 (https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/4574), which was closed due a naming debate. It seems the standard naming for restricting a number to a specified range is indeed 'clamp'. (1)(2)(3) As such, can we use Yusuke Endoh's original patch with the naming adjustments? If so, I can provide accordingly. Cheers. (1) http://www.rubydoc.info/github/epitron/epitools/Numeric:clamp (2) http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12020787/is-there-a-limit-clamp-function-in-ruby (3) https://developer.gnome.org/glib/stable/glib-Standard-Macros.html#CLAMP:CAPS ---Files-------------------------------- num_clamp.c (427 Bytes) comparable-clamp.diff (2.52 KB) -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ Unsubscribe: