[#58730] [ruby-trunk - misc #9188][Open] r43870 make benchmark/bm_so_k_nucleotide.rb slow — "authorNari (Narihiro Nakamura)" <authorNari@...>

17 messages 2013/12/01

[#58732] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9189][Open] Build failure on Windows in case of nonascii TEMP environment. — "phasis68 (Heesob Park)" <phasis@...>

11 messages 2013/12/01

[#58750] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9190][Open] Expose serial helper macros — "simeonwillbanks (Simeon Willbanks)" <sfw@...>

13 messages 2013/12/01

[#58756] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9192][Open] Inconsistent comparison between Float and BigDecimal — "vatsu (Gustavo Sales)" <vatsu21@...>

18 messages 2013/12/02

[#58797] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9198][Open] Segfault in TestException#test_machine_stackoverflow — "vo.x (Vit Ondruch)" <v.ondruch@...>

11 messages 2013/12/02

[#58833] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9205][Open] Assertion failed: heap_pages_deferred_final == 0 — "phasis68 (Heesob Park)" <phasis@...>

11 messages 2013/12/03

[#58866] [ruby-trunk - misc #9215][Open] Maintenance Policy for Future Releases (2.1.0 & beyond) — "hone (Terence Lee)" <hone02@...>

17 messages 2013/12/05

[#58876] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9221][Open] Time.parse performance becomes exponentially worse as string length grows — "mpelzsherman (Michael Pelz-Sherman)" <mpelzsherman@...>

15 messages 2013/12/05

[#58948] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9226][Open] Getting method `inspect' called on unexpected T_NODE object (0x000000025ddea8 flags=0x109089c klass=0x0) (NotImplementedError) from Hash#inspect — "myronmarston (Myron Marston)" <myron.marston@...>

11 messages 2013/12/07

[#59032] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9239][Open] Array#to_h ignores flat arrays — "sawa (Tsuyoshi Sawada)" <sawadatsuyoshi@...>

15 messages 2013/12/10

[#59122] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9251][Open] ! operator has lower precedence than = in an assignment expression — "rits (First Last)" <redmine@...>

26 messages 2013/12/15

[#59198] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9262][Open] global_method_cache should be configurable or grow automatically — "tmm1 (Aman Gupta)" <ruby@...1.net>

28 messages 2013/12/19

[#59209] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9264][Open] Compiling error: encdb.bundle Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64 — "spastorino (Santiago Pastorino)" <santiago@...>

15 messages 2013/12/19
[#59211] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9264][Feedback] Compiling error: encdb.bundle Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64 — "zzak (Zachary Scott)" <e@...> 2013/12/19

[#59212] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #9264][Feedback] Compiling error: encdb.bundle Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64 — Santiago Pastorino <spastorino@...> 2013/12/19

zzak, make distclean is the first thing I've ran. Read the gist again :),

[#59213] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #9264][Feedback] Compiling error: encdb.bundle Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64 — Zachary Scott <e@...> 2013/12/19

Sorry I missed the gist, can you try building outside of $srcdir?

[#59214] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #9264][Feedback] Compiling error: encdb.bundle Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64 — Santiago Pastorino <spastorino@...> 2013/12/19

It works if I do ...

[#59215] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #9264][Feedback] Compiling error: encdb.bundle Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64 — Zachary Scott <e@...> 2013/12/19

I've been using the following:

[#59255] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9276][Open] "RUBY_FREE_MIN is obsolete. Use RUBY_GC_HEAP_FREE_SLOTS instead" warning should not be issued when both ENV vars are set. — "myronmarston (Myron Marston)" <myron.marston@...>

10 messages 2013/12/21

[#59260] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9278][Open] Magic comment "immutable: string" makes "literal".freeze the default for that file — "colindkelley (Colin Kelley)" <colin@...>

12 messages 2013/12/22

[#59343] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9309][Open] Crash while running tests — "mdemare (Michiel de MAre)" <merloen@...>

12 messages 2013/12/27

[#59345] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9310][Open] inheritance.rb: 27: [BUG] Segmentation fault at 0x00000c — "jasnow (Al Snow)" <jasnow@...>

10 messages 2013/12/27

[#59349] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9312][Open] Build the ruby executable in bin/ — "postmodern (Hal Brodigan)" <postmodern.mod3@...>

13 messages 2013/12/28

[#59365] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9316][Open] BigDecimal division in Ruby 2.1 — "abernardes (Andre Oliveira)" <abernardes@...>

15 messages 2013/12/28

[#59398] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9321][Open] rb_mod_const_missing does not generate a c-return event — "drkaes (Stefan Kaes)" <stkaes@...>

41 messages 2013/12/30

[#59429] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9330][Open] [PATCH 0/3] avoid redundant fcntl/fstat syscalls for cloexec sockets — "normalperson (Eric Wong)" <normalperson@...>

10 messages 2013/12/31

[ruby-core:58827] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9192] Inconsistent comparison between Float and BigDecimal

From: "marcandre (Marc-Andre Lafortune)" <ruby-core@...>
Date: 2013-12-03 05:57:20 UTC
List: ruby-core #58827
Issue #9192 has been updated by marcandre (Marc-Andre Lafortune).


duerst (Martin D端rst) wrote:
> nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada) wrote:
> > Sounds like the old usual floating point number error.
> 
> I don't think so. BigDecimal('706.06') is exact. 706.06 is a float, and therefore can't be represented exactly. That means that it's either represented as too small or too big than 706.06. If it's represented as too small, then we should get false twice; if it's represented as too big, we should get true twice.
> This would be "the old usual floating point number error" if Gustavo had asked why 706.06 != BigDecimal('706.06'), but that's not the question here.

I never thought about comparison of float with other numeric types, but should we convert everything to float and compare this way? This way we insure that:

    any_big_decimal.to_f == any_big_decimal

Here, the float 706.06 stands for a small range of real numbers that includes BigDecimal('706.06'). Thus shouldn't we have 706.06 == BigDecimal('706.06')?



----------------------------------------
Bug #9192: Inconsistent comparison between Float and BigDecimal
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/9192#change-43391

Author: vatsu (Gustavo Sales)
Status: Assigned
Priority: Normal
Assignee: mrkn (Kenta Murata)
Category: ext
Target version: 
ruby -v:  2.0.0p353 (2013-11-22 revision 43784) [x86_64-darwin11.4.2]
Backport: 1.9.3: UNKNOWN, 2.0.0: UNKNOWN


I was checking a possible inconsistency on ActiveModel and I found situations where comparing BigDecimal to Float differs to comparing Float to BigDecimal.

I have create a simple ruby script to exemplify the problem. The script is attach to this issue and output is as follows:

Instance number 706.05
###########
Instance number 706.06
Inconsistence:
0.70606E3 > 706.06
706.06 < 0.70606E3
=========
Inconsistence:
0.70606E3 <= 706.06
706.06 >= 0.70606E3
=========
###########
Instance number 706.07
Inconsistence:
0.70607E3 < 706.07
706.07 > 0.70607E3
=========
Inconsistence:
0.70607E3 >= 706.07
706.07 <= 0.70607E3
=========
###########
Instance number 706.08
###########


-- 
http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

In This Thread