[#42344] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5964][Open] Make Symbols an Alternate Syntax for Strings — Tom Wardrop <tom@...>

23 messages 2012/02/03

[#42443] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5985][Open] miniruby skews "make benchmark" results — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>

21 messages 2012/02/08

[#42444] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5986][Open] Segmentation Fault — Luis Matta <levmatta@...>

16 messages 2012/02/08

[#42471] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5995][Open] calling io_advise_internal() in read_all() — Masaki Matsushita <glass.saga@...>

20 messages 2012/02/10

[#42560] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6011][Open] ruby-1.9.3-p0/lib/webrick/utils.rb:184: [BUG] Segmentation fault — Vit Ondruch <v.ondruch@...>

12 messages 2012/02/13

[#42579] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6012][Open] Proc#source_location also return the column — Roger Pack <rogerpack2005@...>

14 messages 2012/02/14

[#42685] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6036][Open] Test failures in Fedora Rawhide/17 — Bohuslav Kabrda <bkabrda@...>

14 messages 2012/02/16

[#42697] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6040][Open] Transcoding test failure: Big5 to UTF8 not defined (MinGW) — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>

10 messages 2012/02/16

[#42813] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6065][Open] Allow Bignum marshalling/unmarshalling from C API — Martin Bosslet <Martin.Bosslet@...>

22 messages 2012/02/23

[#42815] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6066][Open] Fix "control may reach end of non-void function" warnings for clang — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>

15 messages 2012/02/23

[#42857] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6074][Open] Allow alias arguments to have a comma — Thomas Sawyer <transfire@...>

20 messages 2012/02/24

[#42891] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6083][Open] Hide a Bignum definition — Koichi Sasada <redmine@...>

23 messages 2012/02/25

[#42906] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6085][Open] Treatment of Wrong Number of Arguments — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core@...>

14 messages 2012/02/25

[#42949] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6089][Open] Test suite fails with OpenSSL 1.0.1 — Vit Ondruch <v.ondruch@...>

13 messages 2012/02/26

[ruby-core:42622] [ruby-trunk - Feature #1880][Rejected] Hash#flatten Doesn't Operate Recursively for Hash Values

From: Yusuke Endoh <mame@...>
Date: 2012-02-14 13:35:06 UTC
List: ruby-core #42622
Issue #1880 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

Status changed from Assigned to Rejected

I'm rejecting this feature ticket because no progress has been
made for a long time.  See [ruby-core:42391].



I think flatten means an operation on Array, in Ruby.
"flatten" on Hash is also possible, but Hash#flatten is not for
that.  I think we need:

  - a use case
  - another appropriate name
  - detailed semantics (what does {a: {a: 1}}.flatten return?)

-- 
Yusuke Endoh <mame@tsg.ne.jp>
----------------------------------------
Feature #1880: Hash#flatten Doesn't Operate Recursively for Hash Values
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/1880

Author: Run Paint Run Run
Status: Rejected
Priority: Normal
Assignee: Yukihiro Matsumoto
Category: core
Target version: 2.0.0
ruby -v: ruby 1.9.2dev (2009-08-04 trunk 24388) [i686-linux]


=begin
 Hash#flatten claims to flatten recursively if given an argument specifying the depth. This works as expected for Array values, but has no bearing on Hash values. 
 
   >> h = {orange: :orange, coconut: {inside: :white, outside: :brown}, grapes: {colour: [:red, :green]}}
   >> h.flatten
   => [:orange, :orange, :coconut, {:inside=>:white, :outside=>:brown}, :grapes, {:colour=>[:red, :green]}]
   >> h.flatten(20)
   => [:orange, :orange, :coconut, {:inside=>:white, :outside=>:brown}, :grapes, {:colour=>[:red, :green]}]
 
 This seems peculiar. If the user has specified a depth he's explicitly stating the level of recursion to flatten; not how he wants Array values to be treated. IOW, I expected #flatten(depth) to call #flatten on Hash values as appropriate. This can be generalised to: call #flatten on values until the depth has been reached.
=end



-- 
http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

In This Thread

Prev Next