[#123414] [Ruby Bug#21629] Ruby-3.4.7 fails to build using clang / llvm — "debo (David Bohman) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #21629 has been reported by debo (David Bohman).

18 messages 2025/10/07

[#123433] [Ruby Misc#21630] Suggest @Earlopain for core contributor — "kddnewton (Kevin Newton) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #21630 has been reported by kddnewton (Kevin Newton).

9 messages 2025/10/08

[#123484] [Ruby Bug#21640] Core Pathname is missing 3 methods / is partially-defined — "Eregon (Benoit Daloze) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #21640 has been reported by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).

21 messages 2025/10/15

[#123504] [Ruby Bug#21645] Can't `require "resolve"` on Windows under Bundler without warnings — "Earlopain (Earlopain _) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #21645 has been reported by Earlopain (Earlopain _).

9 messages 2025/10/20

[#123506] [Ruby Misc#21646] Propose Luke Gruber as a Ruby committer — "jhawthorn (John Hawthorn) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #21646 has been reported by jhawthorn (John Hawthorn).

8 messages 2025/10/20

[#123576] [Ruby Bug#21654] Set#new calls extra methods compared to previous versions — "tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #21654 has been reported by tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson).

16 messages 2025/10/29

[#123582] [Ruby Bug#21655] segfault when building 3.3.10, regression from 3.3.9 — "kurly (Greg Kubaryk) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #21655 has been reported by kurly (Greg Kubaryk).

15 messages 2025/10/29

[#123586] [Ruby Misc#21656] Exclude dependabot PRs from automated gem release notes — "Earlopain (Earlopain _) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #21656 has been reported by Earlopain (Earlopain _).

8 messages 2025/10/29

[#123595] [Ruby Misc#21657] Question: Is Ruby 4.0 planned for December 2025 or later? — "dmitry.pogrebnoy (Dmitry Pogrebnoy) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

SXNzdWUgIzIxNjU3IGhhcyBiZWVuIHJlcG9ydGVkIGJ5IGRtaXRyeS5wb2dyZWJub3kgKERtaXRy

22 messages 2025/10/29

[#123626] [Ruby Bug#21659] rstring.h error: missing initializer for field ‘len’ of ‘struct RString’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers] starting in ruby-3.3.10 — "wsfulton (William Fulton) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

SXNzdWUgIzIxNjU5IGhhcyBiZWVuIHJlcG9ydGVkIGJ5IHdzZnVsdG9uIChXaWxsaWFtIEZ1bHRv

10 messages 2025/10/31

[ruby-core:123468] [Ruby Bug#21446] StackOverflow when changing visibility in reopened refinement

From: "jeremyevans0 (Jeremy Evans) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>
Date: 2025-10-11 03:40:53 UTC
List: ruby-core #123468
Issue #21446 has been updated by jeremyevans0 (Jeremy Evans).


I found that you don't even need to change the visibility twice. This issue affects all refinement visibility change methods where the method whose visibility is changed by the refinement is in an ancestor of the refined class. Here's a simplified example:

```ruby
class A
  private def a
    :a
  end
end
class B < A
end

module R
  refine B do
    public :a
  end
end
using R
p B.new.a
```

I've submitted a pull request that handles this case: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/14817

----------------------------------------
Bug #21446: StackOverflow when changing visibility in reopened refinement
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/21446#change-114831

* Author: luke-gru (Luke Gruber)
* Status: Open
* ruby -v: 3.5.0
* Backport: 3.2: REQUIRED, 3.3: REQUIRED, 3.4: REQUIRED
----------------------------------------
```ruby
class A
  def a
    :a
  end
end
class B < A
end

module R
  refine B do
    private :a
  end
end
module R
  refine B do
    public :a
  end
end
using R
B.new.a # StackOverflow
```

I would expect it to change the visibility, not to overflow the stack.



-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
______________________________________________
 ruby-core mailing list -- ruby-core@ml.ruby-lang.org
 To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-core-leave@ml.ruby-lang.org
 ruby-core info -- https://ml.ruby-lang.org/mailman3/lists/ruby-core.ml.ruby-lang.org/


In This Thread

Prev Next