[#118346] [Ruby master Bug#20586] Some filesystem calls in dir.c are missing error handling and can return incorrect results if interrupted — "ivoanjo (Ivo Anjo) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>
Issue #20586 has been reported by ivoanjo (Ivo Anjo).
13 messages
2024/06/19
[ruby-core:118367] [Ruby master Feature#20580] Pipe Operator accepting lambda
From:
"matheusrich (Matheus Richard) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>
Date:
2024-06-21 04:55:14 UTC
List:
ruby-core #118367
Issue #20580 has been updated by matheusrich (Matheus Richard).
> I call methods much more frequently than lambdas, so I'm not sure how much this syntax would improve my life.
Agreed. It would be more useful if we had a syntax for getting a method from an object (like [we once had](https://blog.saeloun.com/2019/02/26/ruby-2-7-method-shorthand/)).
----------------------------------------
Feature #20580: Pipe Operator accepting lambda
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20580#change-108874
* Author: martinosis (Martin Chabot)
* Status: Open
----------------------------------------
I think that the pipe operator was not reflecting the actual pipe operator in functional programming language.
In Elixir, Elm, F# etc. The pipe operator takes a value and applies it on the lambda at the right of the operator. Example
```
add_one = -> a { a + 1 }
add_two = -> a { a + 2 }
2 |> add_one |> add_two == 5
```
In combination with the >> operator, some interesting thing can be done.
```
2 |> add_one >> add_two
```
you can refactor to
```
add_tree = add_one >> add_two
2 |> add_tree
```
I currently use the `then` method on Object to do the equivalent. However this takes more characters and you need to put the closing bracket at the end of the line.
```
2.then(&add_one >> add_tree)
```
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
______________________________________________
ruby-core mailing list -- ruby-core@ml.ruby-lang.org
To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-core-leave@ml.ruby-lang.org
ruby-core info -- https://ml.ruby-lang.org/mailman3/postorius/lists/ruby-core.ml.ruby-lang.org/