[#114348] [Ruby master Feature#19832] Method#destructive?, UnboundMethod#destructive? — "sawa (Tsuyoshi Sawada) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #19832 has been reported by sawa (Tsuyoshi Sawada).

15 messages 2023/08/06

[#114365] [Ruby master Bug#19834] Segmentation fault while running in docker — "ramachandran@... (Ramachandran A) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #19834 has been reported by ramachandran@mallow-tech.com (Ramachandran A).

7 messages 2023/08/09

[#114380] [Ruby master Bug#19837] Concurrent calls to Process.waitpid2 misbehave on Ruby 3.1 & 3.2 — "kjtsanaktsidis (KJ Tsanaktsidis) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #19837 has been reported by kjtsanaktsidis (KJ Tsanaktsidis).

7 messages 2023/08/11

[#114399] [Ruby master Feature#19839] Need a method to check if two ranges overlap — "shouichi (Shouichi KAMIYA) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #19839 has been reported by shouichi (Shouichi KAMIYA).

27 messages 2023/08/18

[#114410] [Ruby master Bug#19841] Marshal.dump stack overflow with recursive Time — "segiddins (Samuel Giddins) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #19841 has been reported by segiddins (Samuel Giddins).

9 messages 2023/08/18

[#114422] [Ruby master Feature#19842] Intorduce M:N threads — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #19842 has been reported by ko1 (Koichi Sasada).

30 messages 2023/08/21

[#114590] [Ruby master Bug#19857] Eval coverage is reset after each `eval`. — "ioquatix (Samuel Williams) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #19857 has been reported by ioquatix (Samuel Williams).

21 messages 2023/08/30

[ruby-core:114472] [Ruby master Bug#16288] Segmentation fault with finalizers, threads

From: "jeremyevans0 (Jeremy Evans) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>
Date: 2023-08-23 23:22:50 UTC
List: ruby-core #114472
Issue #16288 has been updated by jeremyevans0 (Jeremy Evans).

Status changed from Open to Closed

davidw (David Welton) wrote in #note-7:
> ```
> --- a/thread.c
> +++ b/thread.c
> @@ -682,7 +682,7 @@ thread_do_start(rb_thread_t *th)
>          else {
>              args_ptr = RARRAY_CONST_PTR(args);
>          }
> -
> +        rb_funcallv(NULL, idInspect, 0, 0);
>          th->value = rb_vm_invoke_proc(th->ec, proc,
>                                        (int)args_len, args_ptr,
>                                        VM_BLOCK_HANDLER_NONE);
> ```
> 
> 
> I replaced the funcall with
> 
>     RUBY_VM_CHECK_INTS(GET_EC());
> 
> And everything seems to work ok.

I checked and now we have `vm_check_ints_blocking(th->ec);` in that spot, so I think this is fixed.

----------------------------------------
Bug #16288: Segmentation fault with finalizers, threads
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/16288#change-104255

* Author: davidw (David Welton)
* Status: Closed
* Priority: Normal
* ruby -v: ruby 2.6.6p116 (2019-10-02 revision 67825) [x86_64-linux]
* Backport: 2.5: UNKNOWN, 2.6: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
Hi,

This is a tricky one and I am still working on narrowing it down, but I will report what I have so far.

I compiled a version of 2_6_6 from github: ruby 2.6.6p116 (2019-10-02 revision 67825) [x86_64-linux]

I have a minimal Rails project that uses Mongoid. It crashes with a segmentation fault when rspec runs. The concurrent ruby gem is in some way involved, and I have been posting there: https://github.com/ruby-concurrency/concurrent-ruby/issues/808

However, I think there is a deeper problem - I would not expect a user level script to cause a segmentation fault.

I have been putting a lot of debugging statements in, and turned on Thread.DEBUG, and have noticed some things. I am not experienced with Ruby's internals, so some of these bits of data might be normal or irrelevant:

* The concurrent-ruby gem uses ObjectSpace.define_finalizer to set a finalizer
* That finalizer creates a new Thread
* However, it appears as if that thread is running after the main thread is already dead, so code that expects to reference the main thread crashes, because it's a NULL reference.

I tried the following test code:

```
class Foo
  def initialize
    ObjectSpace.define_finalizer(self, proc do
                                   Foo.foo_finalizer
                                 end)
  end

  def bar
    puts 'bar'
  end

  def Foo.foo_finalizer
    puts "foo_finalizer"
    t = Thread.new do
      puts "Thread reporting for duty"
    end
    puts "foo_finalizer thread launched"
    sleep 5
  end
end

f = Foo.new
f.bar
f = nil
```

While trying to develop a simple test case to demonstrate the problem. It triggers rb_raise(rb_eThreadError, "can't alloc thread"); in thread_s_new, because it looks like the main thread has already been marked as 'killed' in this case. When I check the main thread status in thread_s_new with the above code, it reports 'dead'.

When I run my rspec code in the sample Rails project, thread_s_new shows the main thread's status as 'run' even if it should be dead?

I have seen some debugging things that shows some exceptions and thread_join interrupts and so on.

Is it possible that something like this is happening?

Main thread starts doing a cleanup, and gets an exception or something that generates an interrupt, and its KILLED status gets reset to RUNNABLE

Then, in the finalizer, it starts creating a Thread, but at this point the main thread actually does get killed, and when that finalizer thread tries to run it runs into a null reference?

I can provide the Rails sample project if needs be.

Sorry if any of the above isn't clear; I've been staring at the C code for several hours and am a bit cross-eyed!

Thank you for any insights.





-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
 ______________________________________________
 ruby-core mailing list -- ruby-core@ml.ruby-lang.org
 To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-core-leave@ml.ruby-lang.org
 ruby-core info -- https://ml.ruby-lang.org/mailman3/postorius/lists/ruby-core.ml.ruby-lang.org/

In This Thread

Prev Next