From: "Dan0042 (Daniel DeLorme)" Date: 2022-11-16T16:25:38+00:00 Subject: [ruby-core:110779] [Ruby master Feature#19117] Include the method owner in backtraces, not just the method name Issue #19117 has been updated by Dan0042 (Daniel DeLorme). I'd like to clarify if we're really talking about showing the *owner* or the *receiver* of the method? ```ruby class Foo def inspect raise "hmm" end end class Bar < Foo end Bar.new.inspect #/path/to/foo.rb:3:in `Foo#inspect': hmm (RuntimeError) #or #/path/to/foo.rb:3:in `Bar#inspect': hmm (RuntimeError) ``` The owner is usually/often right there in the filepath, so I would tend to think the receiver is more useful information. ---------------------------------------- Feature #19117: Include the method owner in backtraces, not just the method name https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19117#change-100125 * Author: byroot (Jean Boussier) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal ---------------------------------------- ``` module Foo class Bar def inspect 1 + '1' end end end p Foo::Bar.new ``` This code produce the following backtrace: ``` /tmp/foo.rb:4:in `+': String can't be coerced into Integer (TypeError) from /tmp/foo.rb:4:in `inspect' from /tmp/foo.rb:9:in `p' from /tmp/foo.rb:9:in `
' ``` This works, but on large codebases and large backtraces the method name isn't always all that revealing, most of the time you need to open many of the locations listed in the backtrace to really understand what is going on. I propose that we also include the owner name: ``` /tmp/foo.rb:4:in `Integer#+': String can't be coerced into Integer (TypeError) from /tmp/foo.rb:4:in `Foo::Bar#inspect' from /tmp/foo.rb:9:in `Kernel#p' from /tmp/foo.rb:9:in `
' ``` I believe that in many case it would allow to much better understand the backtrace without having to jump back and forth between it and the source code. This is inspired by @ivoanjo 's `backtracie` gem: https://github.com/ivoanjo/backtracie -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ Unsubscribe: