ruby-core

Mailing Lists

ruby-list (For Ruby users, JA) ruby-dev (For Ruby developers, JA) ruby-core (For Ruby developers, EN) ruby-talk (For Ruby users, EN)

[#584] win32 popen3 — "Rich Kilmer" <rich@...>

In win32.c there is a CreateChild function:

2 messages 2002/12/03

[#585] Re: win32 popen3 — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu.nokada@...> 2002/12/03

Hi,

[#586] irb aborts in 1.7.3 on Solaris — Jim Freeze <jim@...>

Hi:

6 messages 2002/12/06

[#587] Re: irb aborts in 1.7.3 on Solaris — nobu.nokada@... 2002/12/06

Hi,

[#594] Re: irb aborts in 1.7.3 on Solaris — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2002/12/06

On Saturday, 7 December 2002 at 0:13:47 +0900, nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:

[#595] Re: irb aborts in 1.7.3 on Solaris — nobu.nokada@... 2002/12/06

Hi,

[#589] Re: irb aborts in 1.7.3 on Solaris — ts <decoux@...> 2002/12/06

>>>>> "J" == Jim Freeze <jim@freeze.org> writes:

[#596] Re: irb aborts in 1.7.3 on Solaris — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2002/12/06

On Saturday, 7 December 2002 at 2:35:51 +0900, ts wrote:

[#588] Re: irb aborts in 1.7.3 on Solaris — "Garriss, Michael" <Michael.Garriss@...>

I'm also having trouble getting irb to work on Solaris. My problem appears

2 messages 2002/12/06

[#590] Re: irb aborts in 1.7.3 on Solaris — ts <decoux@...> 2002/12/06

>>>>> "G" == Garriss, Michael <Michael.Garriss@abacus-direct.com> writes:

[#591] Re: irb aborts in 1.7.3 on Solaris — "Garriss, Michael" <Michael.Garriss@...>

okay, now I can't build ext/readline. I recently upgraded readline to 4.3.

2 messages 2002/12/06

[#592] Re: irb aborts in 1.7.3 on Solaris — ts <decoux@...> 2002/12/06

>>>>> "G" == Garriss, Michael <Michael.Garriss@abacus-direct.com> writes:

[#593] Re: irb aborts in 1.7.3 on Solaris — "Garriss, Michael" <Michael.Garriss@...>

Nevermind. I solved that problem. Don't ask :) doing a make install right

2 messages 2002/12/06

[#597] Re: irb aborts in 1.7.3 on Solaris — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2002/12/09

On Saturday, 7 December 2002 at 2:08:24 +0900, Garriss, Michael wrote:

[#598] irb Abort on Solaris Backtrace — Jim Freeze <jim@...>

Hi:

12 messages 2002/12/09

[#599] Re: irb Abort on Solaris Backtrace — ts <decoux@...> 2002/12/09

>>>>> "J" == Jim Freeze <jim@freeze.org> writes:

[#600] Re: irb Abort on Solaris Backtrace — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2002/12/09

On Tuesday, 10 December 2002 at 1:44:43 +0900, ts wrote:

[#602] Re: irb Abort on Solaris Backtrace — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/12/09

Hi,

[#603] Re: irb Abort on Solaris Backtrace — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2002/12/09

On Tuesday, 10 December 2002 at 3:24:46 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#606] Re: irb Abort on Solaris Backtrace — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/12/09

Hi,

[#609] Re: irb Abort on Solaris Backtrace — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2002/12/10

On Tuesday, 10 December 2002 at 7:59:33 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#610] Re: irb Abort on Solaris Backtrace — ts <decoux@...> 2002/12/10

>>>>> "J" == Jim Freeze <jim@freeze.org> writes:

[#612] Re: irb Abort on Solaris Backtrace — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2002/12/10

On Tuesday, 10 December 2002 at 23:00:57 +0900, ts wrote:

[#611] Re: irb Abort on Solaris Backtrace — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/12/10

Hi,

[#613] Re: irb Abort on Solaris Backtrace — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2002/12/10

On Tuesday, 10 December 2002 at 23:28:59 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#614] Re: irb Abort on Solaris Backtrace — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2002/12/11

On Wednesday, 11 December 2002 at 8:11:18 +0900, Jim Freeze wrote:

[#601] Re: irb Abort on Solaris Backtrace — "Garriss, Michael" <Michael.Garriss@...>

I tried: `ruby -r socket -e 0` and got no error. I would really like to

5 messages 2002/12/09

[#604] Re: irb Abort on Solaris Backtrace — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2002/12/09

uname -a

[#607] Re: irb Abort on Solaris Backtrace — ts <decoux@...> 2002/12/10

>>>>> "J" == Jim Freeze <jim@freeze.org> writes:

[#608] Re: irb Abort on Solaris Backtrace — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2002/12/10

On Tuesday, 10 December 2002 at 20:24:57 +0900, ts wrote:

[#605] Re: irb Abort on Solaris Backtrace — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2002/12/09

On Tuesday, 10 December 2002 at 3:24:11 +0900, Garriss, Michael wrote:

[#633] Error installing some extensions under non-default prefix — Jos Backus <jos@...>

Fyi: with today's CVS, when I run

4 messages 2002/12/13

[#634] Re: Error installing some extensions under non-default prefix — Jos Backus <jos@...> 2002/12/13

On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 04:53:41PM +0900, Jos Backus wrote:

[#635] Solaris fwrite() problem (Re: Error installing some extensions under non-default prefix) — nobu.nokada@... 2002/12/15

Hi,

[#638] Re: Solaris fwrite() problem (Re: Error installing some extensions under non-default prefix) — Jos Backus <jos@...> 2002/12/15

On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 03:05:32PM +0900, nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:

[#636] doc/NEWS — Matt Armstrong <matt@...>

22 messages 2002/12/15

[#640] Re: [patch] doc/NEWS — nobu.nokada@... 2002/12/15

Hi,

[#641] Re: [patch] doc/NEWS — Matt Armstrong <matt@...> 2002/12/16

[#642] Re: [patch] doc/NEWS — Matt Armstrong <matt@...> 2002/12/16

Matt Armstrong <matt@lickey.com> writes:

[#643] Re: [patch] doc/NEWS — nobu.nokada@... 2002/12/16

Hi,

[#646] Re: [patch] doc/NEWS — Matt Armstrong <matt@...> 2002/12/16

nobu.nokada@softhome.net writes:

[#647] Re: [patch] doc/NEWS — nobu.nokada@... 2002/12/16

Hi,

[#650] Re: [patch] doc/NEWS — Matt Armstrong <matt@...> 2002/12/16

Matt Armstrong <matt@lickey.com> writes:

[#654] Re: [patch] doc/NEWS — nobu.nokada@... 2002/12/16

Hi,

[#657] Re: [patch] doc/NEWS — Matt Armstrong <matt@...> 2002/12/17

nobu.nokada@softhome.net writes:

[#658] Re: [patch] doc/NEWS — nobu.nokada@... 2002/12/17

Hi,

[#656] Re: [patch] doc/NEWS — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/12/17

Hi,

[#637] Re: [patch] doc/NEWS — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2002/12/15

At Mon, 16 Dec 2002 02:07:40 +0900,

[#639] Re: [patch] doc/NEWS — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/12/15

Hi,

[#644] Re: [patch] doc/NEWS — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2002/12/16

In article <1039993469.392945.14311.nullmailer@picachu.netlab.jp>,

[#645] Re: [patch] doc/NEWS — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/12/16

Hi,

[#648] Re: [patch] doc/NEWS — nobu.nokada@... 2002/12/16

Hi,

[#649] Re: [patch] doc/NEWS — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/12/16

Hi,

[#651] Re: [patch] doc/NEWS — nobu.nokada@... 2002/12/16

Hi,

[#652] Re: [patch] doc/NEWS — nobu.nokada@... 2002/12/16

Hi,

[#653] Re: [patch] doc/NEWS — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/12/16

Hi,

[#655] Re: [patch] doc/NEWS — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/12/17

Hi,

[#659] Ruby instead of PHP? — "Dominik Werder" <d.werder@...>

Hi there,

2 messages 2002/12/17

[#660] Re: Ruby instead of PHP? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/12/18

Hi,

[#661] AW: Welcome to our (ruby-core ML) You are added automatically — "Horst Neuschl" <horst.neuschl@...>

help

1 message 2002/12/18

[#662] Error in sprintf.c? — Alexander Bokovoy <a.bokovoy@...>

Greetings!

3 messages 2002/12/19

[#663] Re: Error in sprintf.c? — nobu.nokada@... 2002/12/19

Hi,

[#664] Re: Error in sprintf.c? — Alexander Bokovoy <a.bokovoy@...> 2002/12/19

On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 09:54:03PM +0900, nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:

[#665] tempfile typo — Jim Freeze <jim@...>

Hi

2 messages 2002/12/20

[#666] Re: tempfile typo — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2002/12/20

At Fri, 20 Dec 2002 10:23:50 +0900,

[#667] Segfault in Ruby 1.7.x/1.8 Proc#to_s — Michael Granger <ged@...>

Hello,

8 messages 2002/12/29

[#668] Re: Segfault in Ruby 1.7.x/1.8 Proc#to_s — ts <decoux@...> 2002/12/30

>>>>> "M" == Michael Granger <ged@FaerieMUD.org> writes:

[#669] Re: Segfault in Ruby 1.7.x/1.8 Proc#to_s — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/12/30

Hi,

[#672] Re: Segfault in Ruby 1.7.x/1.8 Proc#to_s — Michael Granger <ged@...> 2002/12/30

Yukihiro Matsumoto (in "Re: Segfault in Ruby 1.7.x/1.8 Proc#to_s")

[#673] Re: Segfault in Ruby 1.7.x/1.8 Proc#to_s — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/12/30

Hi,

[#674] Re: Segfault in Ruby 1.7.x/1.8 Proc#to_s — Michael Granger <ged@...> 2002/12/30

Yukihiro Matsumoto (in "Re: Segfault in Ruby 1.7.x/1.8 Proc#to_s")

[#670] Re: Segfault in Ruby 1.7.x/1.8 Proc#to_s — ts <decoux@...> 2002/12/30

>>>>> "Y" == Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> writes:

[#671] Re: Segfault in Ruby 1.7.x/1.8 Proc#to_s — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/12/30

Hi,

Re: [patch] doc/NEWS

From: nobu.nokada@...

Date: 2002-12-16 05:08:07 UTC

List: ruby-core #643

Hi,

At Mon, 16 Dec 2002 13:37:22 +0900,
Matt Armstrong wrote:
> > That is "inherited" will be called after subclass is defined.
> > How should we describe this?
> 
> I tried to explain simply (attached as patch against current
> doc/NEWS).

Thank you.

> Also, does this change log of yours change any behavior?  This is
> where I discovered the "inherited" method in the first place -- I see
> now the new timing of "inherited" was done by matz later.

This changed the behavior at exception while class definition,
the class name would be registered or not.  I don't guess it'll
very concern users.

> @@ -1129,12 +1129,20 @@
>  }
>  
>  static VALUE
> -rb_reg_match_m(re, str)
> -    VALUE re, str;
> +rb_reg_match_m(argc, argv, re)

Do you like it? :-)

-- 
Nobu Nakada

Thread

In This Thread