From: djberg96@... (Daniel Berger)
Date: 2004-05-12T02:48:52+09:00
Subject: Re: Question regarding rb_include_module

Hal Fulton <hal9000@hypermetrics.com> wrote in message news:<40A0391E.1070000@hypermetrics.com>...
> Daniel Berger wrote:
> > But, it didn't seem to work.  What am I not seeing?
> 
> Hmm, I'm not much on C extensions. But did you try adding it to Kernel
> instead of Object? That would make sense to me. Am I wrong?
> 
> Hal

I tried that first, actually, but it doesn't work.  Upon further
review, Ruby's process.c declares fork() as a method of Process and as
a global function.  I think it's mixed into Kernel (or Object, I dunno
- I'm confused now).

Anyway, daz's suggestion prompted me to look closer at process.c to
see how it works and I just ended up doing the same thing - declare it
as both a module method and a global function.

Strange that I can't emulate the pure Ruby behavior on the C side,
though.

Thanks.

Dan