From: Chad Fowler <chadfowler@...>
Date: 2004-05-08T05:38:39+09:00
Subject: Re: RAA vs. RubyGems?

On Sat, 8 May 2004 03:12:48 +0900, Tom Copeland <tom@infoether.com> wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 2004-05-07 at 13:44, Mauricio Fern�ndez wrote:
> > > concept is nice, as far as it goes, but it is not as well integrated
> > > with RAA and Ruby as CPAN/cpan is with Perl.
> >
> > There are ongoing talks about integrating Rubygems with Rubyforge and RAA.
> 
> Yup, I'm trying to keep this RFE:
> 
> http://rubyforge.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=196&group_id=5&atid=104
> 
> updated with the status of that effort...
> 

Nahi and some of us RubyGems people have exchanged a few emails about
Rubygems and RAA integration.  We would love to see it happen, but we
shouldn't integrate the production RAA with alpha-level software. 
This week, Nahi sent a message to this list with some of his upcoming,
prioritized TODO items.  I believe it put secure rpc/RubyForge
integration at second place (following enhanced SOAP interface), then
followed by looking into RubyGems.  That should probably match the
RubyGems timeframe quite nicely as well.

Chad
> Yours,
> 
> Tom
> 
> P.S. Apologies for the repeat post from a few weeks back.
> 
>