From: Guillaume Marcais <guslist@...>
Date: 2004-05-08T02:44:11+09:00
Subject: Re: test unit & singleton

Not really the answer I prefer :(

I'll follow your advice.

Thanks,
Guillaume.


On Fri, 2004-05-07 at 12:29, Nathaniel Talbott wrote:
> On May 7, 2004, at 11:09, Gennady wrote:
> 
> > That's why you want to avoid singletons as much as possible when it 
> > comes to unit testing.
> 
> <tongue in="cheek">Perhaps we should rename singleton.rb to 
> hardtotest.rb</tongue> :-/
> 
> 
> > In cases I do need singletons, I usually end up with a regular class 
> > that can be unit tested, and a separate singleton class that simply 
> > delegates all calls to my actual class. Or something similar.
> 
> That would be my suggestion as well.
> 
> 
> Nathaniel
> Terralien, Inc.
> 
> <:((><
> 
>