From: Nathaniel Talbott <nathaniel@...>
Date: 2004-05-08T01:29:56+09:00
Subject: Re: test unit & singleton

On May 7, 2004, at 11:09, Gennady wrote:

> That's why you want to avoid singletons as much as possible when it 
> comes to unit testing.

<tongue in="cheek">Perhaps we should rename singleton.rb to 
hardtotest.rb</tongue> :-/


> In cases I do need singletons, I usually end up with a regular class 
> that can be unit tested, and a separate singleton class that simply 
> delegates all calls to my actual class. Or something similar.

That would be my suggestion as well.


Nathaniel
Terralien, Inc.

<:((><