From: Minero Aoki <aamine@...>
Date: 2004-05-07T22:10:54+09:00
Subject: Re: FileUtils.mv and the :force option

Hi,

  In mail "Re: FileUtils.mv and the :force option"
    Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@PATH.Berkeley.EDU> wrote:

> > The :force option is mentioned in the docs, but it is rejected by 
> > FileUtils.mv. It's easy enough to use a 'rescue Errno' suffix to get 
> > this behavior, so I'm not proposing it should be implemented as an 
> > option to the method. Maybe just remove it from the documentation, then?
> 
> Oops, 'FileUtils.mv ... rescue Errno' is not what the force option would 
> do. So why isn't :force implemented?

Because it is a bug.
I have implemented `force' option now, thanks.

FYI: `Errno' should be SystemCallError.

Best Regards,
Minero Aoki