From: Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...>
Date: 2004-05-07T14:51:30+09:00
Subject: Re: FileUtils.mv and the :force option

Joel VanderWerf wrote:
> 
> The :force option is mentioned in the docs, but it is rejected by 
> FileUtils.mv. It's easy enough to use a 'rescue Errno' suffix to get 
> this behavior, so I'm not proposing it should be implemented as an 
> option to the method. Maybe just remove it from the documentation, then?

Oops, 'FileUtils.mv ... rescue Errno' is not what the force option would 
do. So why isn't :force implemented?