From: Mark Hubbart Date: 2004-04-28T16:28:38+09:00 Subject: Re: Semantics of Multiple Values (updated RCR) On Apr 28, 2004, at 12:14 AM, gabriele renzi wrote: > il Wed, 28 Apr 2004 13:35:09 +0900, Jean-Hugues ROBERT > ha scritto:: > >> Rather than allowing x, y == 1, 2, I would prefer a more >> general x, y =~= 1, 2 whose semantic is richer due to the >> fact that it may end up assigning either x, y or both if >> they don't exist already (or if they were unbound/freed). > > oh, please no more obscure operators. > I think little people here would like this route when in the future we > found ourself using perl6-ish stuff like "@a >>=:=<< @b" :) Oh, but it would pretty up the language so much! | $@\\ .-. //@$ @a >>=:=<< @b // -~- \\ LL ((z)) JJ