From: ts <decoux@...>
Date: 2004-04-15T23:17:11+09:00
Subject: Re: New Local Variable Scope rule

>>>>> "R" == Robert Klemme <bob.news@gmx.net> writes:

R> Why would we have anything defined here although both blocks are not
R> executed in this example?  Slowly I'm loosing grips here...  A summary was
R> definitely in order.

 because ruby don't need to execute a block to see local variables :-)


Guy Decoux