From: Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
Date: 2004-04-14T11:48:36-07:00
Subject: Re: Comments on Ruby

--8jNwmpfkpox/fiJK
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Its Me (itsme213@hotmail.com) wrote:

> > >1.  def ought to return a Method object.  Just because.  Having def
> > >return an object adds a little bit of consistency, IMO.
> >
> > I'd prefer a symbol, FWIW
>=20
> But a symbol itself has no connection back to the class or method. Should=
 it
> instead be some object that combined [UnboundMethod + Symbol], or somethi=
ng
> like that?

You know what namespace you are defining it in.

--=20
Eric Hodel - drbrain@segment7.net - http://segment7.net
All messages signed with fingerprint:
FEC2 57F1 D465 EB15 5D6E  7C11 332A 551C 796C 9F04


--8jNwmpfkpox/fiJK
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFAfYeEMypVHHlsnwQRAnruAKC8+JJjfKOwCHCZKQXtrg91vaAh8gCgldHQ
Rg4knkuVdu9IQJHVWpTMrTM=
=pJwf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--8jNwmpfkpox/fiJK--