From: Its Me <itsme213@...>
Date: 2004-04-15T03:39:22+09:00
Subject: Re: Comments on Ruby

> >1.  def ought to return a Method object.  Just because.  Having def
> >return an object adds a little bit of consistency, IMO.
>
> I'd prefer a symbol, FWIW

But a symbol itself has no connection back to the class or method. Should it
instead be some object that combined [UnboundMethod + Symbol], or something
like that?