From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) Date: 2004-04-09T16:45:24+09:00 Subject: Re: Would a ':=' operator break anything? Hi, In message "Would a ':=' operator break anything?" on 04/04/09, Phil Tomson writes: |Would allowing for overloading a ':=' operator break anything? (seems kind |of Pascalish :) |So the ':=' operator 'looks' close enough to assignment so that the |meaning is clear and it keeps me from having to do: | | b.assign 42 | |Which is how I do it currently with this class and several other classes |I've come up with over the years. | |So how about it, would allowing a ':=' operator break anything? The point is what you want is not assignment in Ruby. It might cause confusion that naming ":=" something which is not an assignment. Besides that, I may use ":=" for something different in the future, although I have no plan now (I had thought to use it once). matz.