From: Shu-yu Guo <shu@...>
Date: 2004-04-03T23:44:17+09:00
Subject: Re: Kwartz feature requests

Makoto Kuwata wrote:
> Sorry for late reply.
> 
Quite all right. :)
> 
> As a workaround, you can write it using raw-code, like the following:
> 
Actually, what I do now is just to alias the Scanner#word? method. 
Because I had to write a custom Translator class anyways to fit the 
output into my system, I figured I might as well just alias the method. 
Then I include this file with the new Translator class and aliased 
methods into a special version of the kwartz script, and everything 
works to my liking.

If you don't want to add anything, then don't. Ruby programmers, who 
have access to the full internal of Kwartz, can change behavior without 
even hacking up kwartz.rb. Because of this ability, it's probably not 
worth it for you to add another special case.

On a sidenote, the Analyzer is really useful. :) My translator generates 
different variable names depending on scope.

-- 
That's some catch, that Catch-22.
Oh, it's the best there is.