From: James Britt Date: 2004-03-28T07:19:06+09:00 Subject: Re: Question on generic lib names (was Re: [ANN] Ruby-rdf) Dave Thomas wrote: > > On Mar 26, 2004, at 22:03, James Britt wrote: > >> The Ruby code for the Redland wrapper show the use of >> >> require 'rdf' >> >> I would prefer to see >> >> require 'redland/rdf' > > > It seems to me that its rdf first, and a particular implementation > second. I'd tend to suggest rdf/redland over redland/rdf. That makes sense. Each section narrows the focus. James