From: Dave Thomas <dave@...>
Date: 2004-03-28T00:38:19+09:00
Subject: Re: Question on generic lib names (was Re: [ANN] Ruby-rdf)


On Mar 26, 2004, at 22:03, James Britt wrote:

> The Ruby code for the Redland wrapper show the use of
>
>   require 'rdf'
>
> I would prefer to see
>
>   require 'redland/rdf'

It seems to me that its rdf first, and a particular implementation 
second. I'd tend to suggest rdf/redland over redland/rdf.


Cheers

Dave