From: Simon Strandgaard <neoneye@...>
Date: 2004-03-22T21:44:47+09:00
Subject: Re: [rcr] rename append_features -> include_object

On Mon, 22 Mar 2004 08:37:10 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
> In message "[rcr] rename append_features -> include_object"
>     on 04/03/22, Simon Strandgaard <neoneye@adslhome.dk> writes:
> 
> |There is a saying: avoid asymmetry
> |
> |we have
> |extended       <->   included
> |extend_object  <->   "append_features"
> |
> |symmetry would be nice in ruby2
> 
> But append_features does "append features" to the class/module.  The
> name "include_object" is quite misleading.
> 

true


> I'd rather remove extend_object and append_features, which is older
> than included/extended hooks.
> 

Seems as the right choice. Thanks Matz.

--
Simon Strandgaard