From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Date: 2004-03-22T08:37:10+09:00
Subject: Re: [rcr] rename append_features -> include_object

Hi,

In message "[rcr] rename append_features -> include_object"
    on 04/03/22, Simon Strandgaard <neoneye@adslhome.dk> writes:

|There is a saying: avoid asymmetry
|
|we have
|extended       <->   included
|extend_object  <->   "append_features"
|
|symmetry would be nice in ruby2

But append_features does "append features" to the class/module.  The
name "include_object" is quite misleading.

I'd rather remove extend_object and append_features, which is older
than included/extended hooks.

							matz.