From: Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
Date: 2004-03-19T16:04:44-08:00
Subject: Re: Mozilla gets support for other client-side languages in the future, how about Ruby?

--KQ2iXOoQ638mtNze
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Sean Russell (ser@germane-software.com) wrote:

> Again, I don't know, not knowing the details of what would be
> involved.  A really basic interface, as I said, probably wouldn't take
> more than a few hours.  What gets tricky (or takes up time) is stuff
> like:

[...]

> 3) The DOM interface
>=20
> The DOM interface is the major mechanism for communicating between
> code and the HTML rendering engine.

I don't think you have to worry too much about this, it seems to be
fully XPCOM-ified:

http://lxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/source/dom/idl/

--=20
Eric Hodel - drbrain@segment7.net - http://segment7.net
All messages signed with fingerprint:
FEC2 57F1 D465 EB15 5D6E  7C11 332A 551C 796C 9F04


--KQ2iXOoQ638mtNze
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFAW4qcMypVHHlsnwQRAlc+AJ4hvXB4zV7OIAU6jbeFvYk8il4RTwCgzlsi
pILOGsOQf2bj8I26BnwGdBs=
=mOO2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--KQ2iXOoQ638mtNze--