From: Chad Fowler <chad@...>
Date: 2004-03-17T05:09:26+09:00
Subject: Re: RAA - So much is broken

On Wed, 17 Mar 2004, Hal Fulton wrote:

# Chad Fowler wrote:
# > #   I could do http://raa.rubycentral.org and/or http://raa.rubycentral.org.  
# > # The advantage is that they would be easy for people to remember even if 
# > # ruby-lang.org is down and there are no links.
# > # 
# > 
# > or how about http://raa.rubycentral.org? ;)
# > 
# > (I meant to include http://raa.rubygarden.org).
# 
# I vote for all three.  :P
# 
# Actually, might it not be a good idea for things to migrate
# gradually to rubyforge?
# 
# AFAIK you don't have to use "all" its features just to use it
# for storage.


That's a mighty progressive though.  If we're (the community) ready for 
it, I think it would be fantastic.  No need for a separate RAA and 
RubyForge when RubyForge could be RAA.succ.succ.  

What do the RAA and RubyForge guys think?

Chad