From: Chad Fowler <chad@...>
Date: 2004-03-13T21:11:38+09:00
Subject: Re: Rubicon was Re: [ANN] Jruby 0.7.0


On Mar 13, 2004, at 2:57 AM, Dmitry V. Sabanin wrote:

> On Saturday 13 March 2004 10:20, Chad Fowler wrote:
>> On Mar 12, 2004, at 12:33 PM, Thomas E Enebo wrote:
>>>   This version also boasts improved results in rubicon passing nearly
>>> 100 more tests which translates into about 800 more assertions.  Here
>>> is
>>> a test summary:
>>
>> Did you checkout rubicon from its new home on rubyforge?  It's been
>> updated quite a bit since the last version from the Ruby CVS
>> repository.  We've moved it here temporarily to try to bring it update
>> to date with Ruby 1.8.* and Test::Unit.  It's in pretty good shape but
>> needs the kinks worked out on a variety of different platforms.
>>
>> Anyone who cares to check it out from CVS and give it a go, please do
>> and send in your results.
> Where should I send my results? I have some errors using ruby-1.9 from 
> cvs, i.e.
> in rubicon.rb VERSION constant is used, but in 1.9 it doesn't exists.
> 	not defined?(VERSION) and VERSION = RUBY_VERSION
> fixes that, but not too clean though. So about my initial question, 
> where should I send
> all other errors I got from running 'make test'?
>

You can either send them using the post.rb that is included with 
Rubicon:

ruby AllTests.rb -op xml|ruby post.rb

or you can email them.

Thanks,
Chad