From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Date: 2004-03-08T11:18:42+09:00
Subject: Re: proposal:  class<<obj to invoke extend_object

Hi,

In message "Re: proposal:  class<<obj to invoke extend_object"
    on 04/03/08, Simon Strandgaard <neoneye@adslhome.dk> writes:

|Still... I propose that 'class<<self' should invoke #extended or some sort
|of suitable replacement, so that initialization can take place.
|What do you think ?
|
|Should it be named #extended ?  or  have another name?

Describe yourself deeper.  What exactly is your proposal?  And why do
you think it's needed?

Remember, since singleton class always exists for each object
(virtually), 'class <<obj' is rather corresponds to class re-opening.

							matz.