From: David Garamond <lists@...6.isreserved.com>
Date: 2004-03-05T21:03:51+09:00
Subject: Re: non-root binary distribution

nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
> At Fri, 5 Mar 2004 19:51:08 +0900,
> David Garamond wrote in [ruby-talk:94318]:
> 
>>But will static Ruby be problematic when building extensions? For 
>>example, I tried with plruby and it didn't produce a proper plruby.so. 
>>Maybe most Ruby extensions are developed with a shared Ruby in mind.
> 
> Don't worry, even with --disable-shared, standard extension
> libraries are built properly.
> I don't know how "it didn't produce a proper" so, but think the
> reason would be another problem.

Yes, standard extension are all built successfully. I also just tried 
building ruby-postgres and mysql-ruby with no problem. I guess plruby is 
a different case as it tries to link with ruby itself.

Thanks,
-- 
dave