From: "Ara.T.Howard" Date: 2004-02-27T01:34:48+09:00 Subject: Re: ruby-dev summary 22877-23014 On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote: > Hi, > > At Thu, 26 Feb 2004 20:34:48 +0900, > gabriele renzi wrote in [ruby-talk:93740]: > > >[ruby-dev:22877] Process.spawn & IO.popen without shell > > > > > > Nobuyoshi Nakada proposed a new method Process.spawn. > > > This method offers portable interface to spawn processes asynchronously. > > > > yuhu! > > I always wanted this, even If I thought that should go in Kernel, like > > fork() and exec(). Why this goes in Process ? > > Well, rather I'll feel nice if there are also those two in > Process. Which is better, or both? both. i too, have always wanted this. IO.popen is _ok_ - but for my uses not useful since i lose stderr. using open3 has other problems... -a -- =============================================================================== | EMAIL :: Ara [dot] T [dot] Howard [at] noaa [dot] gov | PHONE :: 303.497.6469 | ADDRESS :: E/GC2 325 Broadway, Boulder, CO 80305-3328 | URL :: http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/stp/ | TRY :: for l in ruby perl;do $l -e "print \"\x3a\x2d\x29\x0a\"";done ===============================================================================