From: Chad Fowler <chad@...>
Date: 2004-02-23T22:55:37+09:00
Subject: Re: Ruby to Parrot compiler

On Mon, 23 Feb 2004, Nathaniel Talbott wrote:

# 
# On Feb 22, 2004, at 03:58, Robert Feldt wrote:
# 
# > [Ripper] In theory should be in sync with Ruby's parser since it is 
# > based on it but might lag if there are changes to Ruby's (although I 
# > think changes are minor in practice). Downside: more work.
# 
# One thing about Ripper that I heard at the RubyConf (someone please 
# correct me if I'm wrong) is that matz plans on using it for Rite's 
# parser, so eventually it is guaranteed to always be in sync with the 
# most current Ruby. For that reason it seems like it would be great for 
# folks to be improving it now, as it means less work for matz in the 
# long run.
# 


I remember hearing the same but would like to know if this info is still 
current.  Matz?

Chad