From: "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
Date: 2004-02-23T08:12:51+09:00
Subject: Re: A way to "require 'warnings'"

Hi --

On Mon, 23 Feb 2004, Jason Creighton wrote:

> On Sat, 21 Feb 2004 09:31:11 +0900, 
> Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@PATH.Berkeley.EDU> wrote:
> 
> > Jason Creighton wrote:
> > > It would be nice if there was a "warnings.rb" file in the standard
> > > distribution that contained:
> > > 
> > > $VERBOSE = true
> > > 
> > > ...so you could say
> > > 
> > > require 'warnings'
> > > 
> > > in a script, which, IMHO, reads a little better than "$VERBOSE = true"
> > > 
> > > What do you think?
> > 
> > Makes sense. Or it could be 'ant.rb' instead of 'warnings.rb' so that 
> > you could say
> > 
> > $ ruby -rant -e 'p Math.cos 0'
> > -e:1: warning: parenthesize argument(s) for future version
> > 1.0
> 
> Oh! Neat idea! We could also have 'ave.rb' as an alias. :-)

And 'emonstrate.rb' :-)


David

-- 
David A. Black
dblack@wobblini.net