From: Daniel Carrera Date: 2004-02-11T08:32:03+09:00 Subject: Re: Opinion: Ruby + OpenOffice.org On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 08:24:59AM +0900, Phil Tomson wrote: > > So we can figure out if it's worth going to extra mile for the C++ > > bindings. > > Why couldn't you just swig their C++ libraries? > http://www.swig.org > > Swig would probably do about 80% of the wrapping work for you. I would have no idea of how to do this. If I go the other route at least I can ask for help from the OOo developers. Cheers, -- Daniel Carrera | No trees were harmed in the generation of this e-mail. PhD student. | A significant number of electrons were, however, severely Math Dept. UMD | inconvenienced.