From: Asfand Yar Qazi Date: 2004-01-01T00:51:47+09:00 Subject: Re: ruby-dev summary 22273-22434(GPL misconceptions) Simon Strandgaard wrote: > On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 17:10:52 +0900, Austin Ziegler wrote: > [snip] > >>As far as replacing the regex engine, I'd actually love to see some >>of the proposals for Perl 6 Regexen implemented for Ruby 2.0 to >>remove some of the places that are needlessly complex and confusing. > > > > I am working on a regexp engine written entirely in Ruby. My friend Mark > Sparshatt are working on a perl6 parser for it. When I am done > implementing a more efficient scanner routine, I will look into the perl6 > parser also. > > It will be able to support a wide range of inputs formats, because it > internally uses iterators. > > http://raa.ruby-lang.org/list.rhtml?name=regexp > > BTW: license=Ruby's > > -- > Simon Strandgaard Uhhh.... does this mean that I can't make a closed-source game that uses Ruby for scripting? (I'm talking maybe 10 years from now, when I have my own company.) The game engine would be a ruby extension, and the 'normal' ruby interpreter would run scripts that interface with it. Would this therefore be illegal? Uh-ho... -- http://www.it-is-truth.org/