From: "T. Onoma" <transami@...>
Date: 2003-12-17T22:29:45+09:00
Subject: Re: UnboundMethods Useless?

On Wednesday 17 December 2003 01:59 pm, ts wrote:
> >>>>> "T" == T Onoma <transami@runbox.com> writes:
>
> T> Expectations' are precisely the point.
>
>  If you expect something else than a coredump, then probably there is
>  something that you have not yet found.

Why Guy? In lisp you can move functions around til the cows come home. I'm 
guessing that given your remarks that there's something going on in Ruby's 
evaluation of method definitions that make them irreversible, i.e. incapable 
of being pulled from the binding context and bound to another. If that is the 
case then I would suggest that perhaps it would not be unwise for someone as 
capabale as yourself to consider how one might preserve reversibility in 
order to vanquish this limitation.

-- 
T.