From: jrb3@...
Date: 2003-12-12T03:05:19+09:00
Subject: Re: Ideas for replacing $0==__FILE__

> On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 12:38:37 +0900, Jamis Buck wrote:
> I would suggest yes. Perhaps -t and -tr (e.g., -t only runs the last; -tr
> runs all). What was brought up on #ruby-lang is whether the TEST {} blocks
> would be exclusive, overriding normal behaviour. This may be desirable.

Not quite sure what you mean by "exclusive".  Do you mean it would ignore
anything not in some TEST{} block?  Then it would be useless for putting
unit-tests in the same file as classes/modules under test.  Again, in my
experience, that would make TEST{} useless.

        Joseph Beckenbach
        lead XP tester, Eidogen Inc.