From: gabriele renzi <surrender_it@...1.vip.ukl.yahoo.com>
Date: 2003-12-11T08:12:02+09:00
Subject: Re: Finding Software, prenatal projects at RubyForge (Was: format money)

il Thu, 11 Dec 2003 03:14:43 +0900, Tom Copeland <tom@infoether.com>
ha scritto::

>On Wed, 2003-12-10 at 12:15, Hal Fulton wrote:
>> Well, maybe they could be marked inactive in some way. When they
>> appeared in a list, they could be flagged with a little icon, and
>> when the page is visited, it could have a big red warning at the
>> top.
>
>Hm, that's an good idea.  Might be a tricky bit trying to figure out
>what makes a project inactive, though... lack of CVS commits?  Lack of
>page views or downloads?  Dunno.  

well.. how's the 'most active projects' stuff working?
I think if a project has some commit in the latest N months it is
active, no matter how big they are. I suppose page view and downloads
are just useless for this classification